University of Michigan - Ann Arbor

- Learning Concepts and Categories: Is Spacing the “Enemy of Induction”?
- Utilizing learning analytics to map students' self-reported study strategies to click behaviors in STEM courses.
- Does mediator use contribute to the spacing effect for cued recall? Critical tests of the mediator hypothesis.

References on the effects of spacing compared to massing

Kornell, N., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). Learning concepts and categories: Is spacing the “enemy of induction”?. Psychological science, 19(6), 585-592.

Learning Concepts and Categories: Is Spacing the “Enemy of Induction”?

Rodriguez, F., Yu, R., Park, J., Rivas, M. J., Warschauer, M., & Sato, B. K. (2019, March). Utilizing learning analytics to map students' self-reported study strategies to click behaviors in STEM courses. In Proceedings of the 9th international conference on learning analytics & knowledge (pp. 456-460).

Morehead, K., Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Bishop, M., & Pyc, M. A. (2018). Does mediator use contribute to the spacing effect for cued recall? Critical tests of the mediator hypothesis. Memory (Hove), 26(4), 535–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2017.1381266


Learn Before

Related