In Book 2, Section 107 of the Masnavi, Jalaluddin Rumi refutes the literalist objection to the prenatal prostration of John the Baptist to Jesus. Rumi argues that for those possessing spiritual insight (ahl-e khater), realities hidden from the physical senses are completely present and visible. He emphasizes that spiritual connection does not require physical proximity, as the spiritually awakened can perceive the divine even with closed eyes. To further illustrate that meaning transcends literal speech and material constraints, Rumi points to the way fables like Kalila and Dimna convey profound truths through the imagined dialogue of animals, proving that deeper spiritual meanings are independent of physical mechanics.

Google

## Original content
<div dir="rtl" style="text-align: right; line-height: 2; margin-top: 0.5rem;">

این بداند کانک اهل خاطرست 
غایب آفاق او را حاضرست
پیش مریم حاضر آید در نظر 
مادر یحیی که دورست از بصر
دیده‌ها بسته ببیند دوست را 
چون مشبک کرده باشد پوست را
ور ندیدش نه از برون نه از اندرون 
از حکایت گیر معنی ای زبون
نی چنان کافسانه‌ها بشنیده بود 
همچو شین بر نقش آن چفسیده بود
تا همی‌گفت آن کلیله بی‌زبان 
چون سخن نوشد ز دمنه بی بیان
ور بدانستند لحن همدگر 
فهم آن چون مرد بی نطقی بشر
در میان شیر و گاو آن دمنه چون 
شد رسول و خواند بر هر دو فسون
چون وزیر شیر شد گاو نبیل 
چون ز عکس ماه ترسان گشت پیل
این کلیله و دمنه جمله افتراست 
ورنه کی با زاغ لک‌لک را مریست
ای برادر قصه چون پیمانه‌ایست 
معنی اندر وی مثال دانه‌ایست
دانهٔ معنی بگیرد مرد عقل 
ننگرد پیمانه را گر گشت نقل
ماجرای بلبل و گل گوش دار 
گر چه گفتی نیست آنجا آشکار

</div>

## English translation
This should know whoever is of inward awareness: the absent horizons are present to him. Before Mary there comes present in vision the mother of Yahya, though she is far from bodily sight. With the eyes closed, he sees the Friend, when he has made the skin like a lattice. And if you have not seen him, neither from without nor from within, take the meaning from the story, O lowly one. Not like one who has heard fables and has clung to their depicted form like the letter shin to its written shape, so that he keeps saying: How did that tongueless Kalila drink in speech from Dimna without speech? And if they understood one another's tones, how could a speechless human understand that? How did Dimna, between the lion and the bull, become a messenger and recite spells over both? How did the noble bull become the lion's vizier? How did the elephant become frightened by the moon's reflection? This Kalila and Dimna is all fabrication; otherwise, when would a stork have a quarrel with a crow? Brother, a story is like a measuring vessel; the meaning within it is like grain. The man of intellect takes the grain of meaning and does not look at the vessel, once it has been conveyed. Listen to the tale of the nightingale and the rose, though speech there is not manifest.

دفتر دوم - بخش ۱۰۷ - جواب اشکال / Book Two - Section 107 - Answer to the Objection

In Book 1, Section 26 of the Masnavi, Rumi emphasizes the necessity of transcending the physical senses to awaken spiritual perception. Speaking through the character of the vizier, Rumi advises seekers to put cotton in the ears of their worldly senses in order to hear the divine call of 'Irji'i' (Return to your Lord). He contrasts the outward, physical journey, which is limited to the material world ('dry land'), with the inward, spiritual journey that steps into the divine 'sea'. This illustrates the core Sufi principle that the silencing of outward faculties and worldly chatter is a necessary prerequisite for experiencing inner spiritual realities.

Closing Physical Senses to Awaken Spiritual Perception in the Masnavi

Root URL: https://huggingface.co/
Source URL: https://huggingface.co/datasets/mabidan/ganjoor/resolve/main/train.csv

This Reference node represents the source used by the Literature-to-1Cademy migration agent.

Ganjoor Persian Poetry Dataset on Hugging Face

## Original content
<div dir="rtl" style="text-align: right; line-height: 2; margin-top: 0.5rem;">

ماجرای شمع با پروانه تو 
بشنو و معنی گزین ز افسانه تو
گر چه گفتی نیست سر گفت هست 
هین به بالا پر مپر چون جغد پست
گفت در شطرنج کین خانهٔ رخست 
گفت خانه از کجاش آمد بدست
خانه را بخرید یا میراث یافت 
فرخ آنکس کو سوی معنی شتافت
گفت نحوی زید عمروا قد ضرب 
گفت چونش کرد بی جرمی ادب
عمرو را جرمش چه بد کان زید خام 
بی گنه او را بزد همچون غلام
گفت این پیمانهٔ معنی بود 
گندمی بستان که پیمانه‌ست رد
زید و عمرو از بهر اعرابست و ساز 
گر دروغست آن تو با اعراب ساز
گفت نی من آن ندانم عمرو را 
زید چون زد بی‌گناه و بی‌خطا
گفت از ناچار و لاغی بر گشود 
عمرو یک واو فزون دزدیده بود
زید واقف گشت دزدش را بزد 
چونک از حد برد او را حد سزد

</div>

## English translation
Hear the tale of the candle with the moth — listen and choose meaning from the fable. Though speech is absent, the secret of speech is there; beware — fly upward, do not fly low like an owl. One said in chess: "This is the rook's square"; another said: "How did he come to have a house?" "Did he buy the house or inherit it?" Blessed is one who hastens toward meaning. A grammarian said: "Zayd struck ʿAmr"; another said: "How did he punish him without cause?" "What was ʿAmr's crime, that this raw Zayd struck him guiltless, as one strikes a slave?" He said: "This was the vessel of meaning; take a grain of wheat — the vessel is to be discarded." Zayd and ʿAmr exist for the sake of grammatical inflection and form; if that is false, deal yourself with the inflection. He said: "No, I cannot grasp that — how did Zayd strike ʿAmr without guilt or fault?" He said: out of necessity a jest was opened — ʿAmr had stolen one extra wāw. Zayd found out and struck the thief; since he exceeded the limit, the ḥadd-punishment is his due.

دفتر دوم - بخش ۱۰۸ - سخن گفتن به زبان حال و فهم کردن آن / Book Two - Section 108 - Speaking in the language of state and understanding it

Rumi's Defense of Spiritual Perception over Physical Proximity

In Jalaluddin Rumi's *Masnavi*, particularly in Book Two, Section 94, Rumi expounds on the concept of spiritual senses (*havas-e batini*). He explains that the physical senses are limited to the material world, but when a mystic undergoes spiritual transformation and one of their inner senses breaks its bonds to perceive the unseen (*ghayb*), a chain reaction occurs. This single illuminated sense acts as a prophet to the other senses, transforming them so that they all begin to perceive the spiritual reality. Rumi uses the metaphor of a flock of sheep following one that leaps across a stream to illustrate how the awakening of one spiritual sense elevates all others, leading the mystic to the garden of truths where reality is perceived directly and without the need for allegorical interpretation (*ta'wil*).

The Unity and Transformation of Spiritual Senses in the Masnavi

In the Masnavi, Jalaluddin Rumi utilizes the 'scent of Joseph' as a metaphor for the 'Scent of the Real' ($$Haqq$$) to illustrate the nature of spiritual perception ($$basirah$$). Rumi contrasts the physical proximity of Joseph's brothers—who remained blind to his spiritual reality—with the physical distance of Jacob, whose love allowed him to detect the divine fragrance from a hundred leagues away. This metaphor emphasizes that spiritual truth is experienced not through external senses or formal knowledge ($$ilm$$), but through the heart's receptivity and love ($$ishq$$). One who lacks this inner sense is likened to the bearer of Joseph's shirt who, despite holding the garment, remains oblivious to the spiritual fragrance that revived Jacob's sight.

Learn Before

Related