Essay

State the primary arguments raised by critics against the use of intentional deception in psychological research as described in the course materials.

Question: State the primary arguments raised by critics against the use of intentional deception in psychological research as described in the course materials.

Sample answer: Critics argue that intentional deception is rarely ethically justifiable because it fundamentally undermines a participant's ability to provide truly informed consent and fails to respect their basic human dignity. In addition, discovering the deception can cause participants significant psychological distress, foster distrust that leads to less honest responses in future studies, and damage the public reputation of the scientific community.

Key points:

  • Deception prevents participants from giving truly informed consent.
  • Deception fails to respect participants' basic human dignity.
  • Discovering deception can cause significant psychological distress.
  • Deception fosters distrust, leading to less honest responses in future studies.
  • Deception damages the public reputation of the scientific community.

Rubric: Grading Rubric: - 1 point: Mentions that deception prevents truly informed consent. - 1 point: Mentions that it fails to respect basic human dignity. - 1 point: Mentions that it causes psychological distress. - 1 point: Mentions that it fosters distrust leading to less honest responses in future studies. - 1 point: Mentions that it damages the public reputation of the scientific community.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-26

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related