Learn Before
Arguments Against Deception in Research
Many researchers argue that intentionally deceiving study participants is rarely ethically justifiable due to the potential for significant harm. Critics maintain that deceptive practices fundamentally undermine a participant's ability to provide truly informed consent and fail to respect their basic human dignity. Furthermore, discovering they have been deceived can cause participants significant psychological distress, foster distrust that leads to less honest responses in future studies, and ultimately damage the public reputation of the scientific community.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Process of Deception
Examples of Deception
Debriefing
Example of Deception: Studying Opinions on Attire
A research team wants to study how the perceived authority of a person giving instructions affects compliance. They recruit participants for what is described as a 'market research survey on new products.' During the study, an actor, posing as either a senior lab director in a formal coat or a fellow participant in casual clothes, instructs the participant to shred a stack of papers containing what they are told is 'another group's completed survey data.' In reality, the papers are blank. After the interaction, the researchers fully explain the true purpose of the study, why the misdirection was used, and confirm that no real data was destroyed. Which of the following statements best evaluates the use of deception in this experiment according to ethical guidelines?
Incidental Learning
Minimizing Deception
Forms of Deception in Research
Fill-in-the-Blank: Justification for Deception
Arguments Against Deception in Research
Justifying Deception in Research
Tuskegee Syphilis Study
Why do researchers sometimes intentionally mislead participants about the nature or purpose of a psychological study?