Learn Before
Case Study

Based on this context, diagnose the ethical issue present in the investigator's plan, identify the specific moral principle it conflicts with, and explain the justification for why this approach might still be employed.

Case context: An investigator wants to study obedience to authority. Recognizing that participants will behave unnaturally if they are fully aware of the research design, the investigator plans to intentionally mislead participants by telling them the study is about memory performance rather than obedience.

Question: Based on this context, diagnose the ethical issue present in the investigator's plan, identify the specific moral principle it conflicts with, and explain the justification for why this approach might still be employed.

Sample answer: The ethical issue present is the use of deception, as the investigator is intentionally misleading participants about the true purpose of the study. This conflicts with the moral principle of acting with integrity and being truthful. However, this approach is justified because understanding obedience to authority is difficult or impossible to study accurately if participants are fully aware of the research design.

Key points:

  • Identify the use of deception (intentionally misleading participants about the nature or purpose).
  • Identify the conflict with the moral principle of acting with integrity and being truthful.
  • Explain the justification that obedience to authority is difficult or impossible to study accurately with full participant awareness.

Rubric: The answer must identify the use of deception (misleading about the study's purpose) as the ethical issue, state that it conflicts with the moral principle of acting with integrity/truthfulness, and explain that studying obedience to authority accurately is difficult or impossible if participants know the true design.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-26

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related