Learn Before
Example of Deception in Research
An example of deception in research is inaccurately describing an experiment's true purpose to participants to prevent their knowledge from affecting their responses. For instance, if researchers want to study how people's opinions are affected by someone's attire, they might use deception so participants act naturally.
0
1
Tags
Psychology @ OpenStax
Introduction to Psychology @ OpenStax Course
OpenStax
OpenStax Psychology (2nd ed.) Textbook
Psychology
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Process of Deception
Examples of Deception
Debriefing
Example of Deception: Studying Opinions on Attire
A research team wants to study how the perceived authority of a person giving instructions affects compliance. They recruit participants for what is described as a 'market research survey on new products.' During the study, an actor, posing as either a senior lab director in a formal coat or a fellow participant in casual clothes, instructs the participant to shred a stack of papers containing what they are told is 'another group's completed survey data.' In reality, the papers are blank. After the interaction, the researchers fully explain the true purpose of the study, why the misdirection was used, and confirm that no real data was destroyed. Which of the following statements best evaluates the use of deception in this experiment according to ethical guidelines?
Incidental Learning
Minimizing Deception
Forms of Deception in Research
Fill-in-the-Blank: Justification for Deception
Arguments Against Deception in Research
Justifying Deception in Research
Tuskegee Syphilis Study
Why do researchers sometimes intentionally mislead participants about the nature or purpose of a psychological study?
Because deception directly conflicts with the moral principle of acting with integrity, psychological investigators are never permitted to intentionally mislead participants about the true purpose of a study.
In a study on bystander intervention, a researcher stages a fake theft in a waiting room to see if participants will report it. Match each part of this research process to the ethical standard or justification regarding deception it illustrates.
A researcher is planning a study on social influence and determines that revealing the true hypothesis would cause participants to change their natural behavior. Arrange the following steps in the correct logical sequence of ethical analysis and implementation for using deception in this study.
Imagine you are developing a new experimental protocol to investigate how social exclusion affects cognitive performance. Because participants would likely alter their behavior if they knew the study's true focus, you determine that deception is necessary. Which of the following research plans best constructs an ethical design that incorporates deception for this purpose?
In psychological research, the practice of intentionally misleading participants about the true nature or purpose of a study is known as _____.
When evaluating the ethical trade-offs of a research design, a scientist must justify the use of deception by weighing the potential scientific merit against the violation of the moral principle of _____.
A researcher designs a study on cheating behavior. Participants are told the study is about "problem-solving ability," but the real purpose is to observe whether they copy answers from a visible answer key when left alone briefly. Because informing participants of the true purpose would cause them to alter their behavior, and the researcher plans to fully debrief all participants immediately after data collection ends, this use of deception aligns with the conditions recognized by the APA Ethics Code.
Deception in psychological research can take several distinct forms. Match each form of deception to the characteristic that best defines it.
An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is evaluating whether a proposed study's use of deception is ethically justifiable. Arrange the following evaluative criteria in the logical order the IRB should apply them—from the most foundational prerequisite to the final safeguard—to reach a defensible ethical judgment.
Explain the concept of deception in psychological research. In your response, define deception, state the specific moral principle it conflicts with, and describe the scientific justification researchers use for employing it.
Based on this context, diagnose the ethical issue present in the investigator's plan, identify the specific moral principle it conflicts with, and explain the justification for why this approach might still be employed.
An investigator wants to study a scientific question, but they know that if participants are fully aware of the research design, they cannot study it accurately. Apply the concept of deception to explain how the investigator might design their study to get accurate results, and state the moral principle they must balance when choosing this design. Limit your response to one to three sentences.
In psychological research, why do investigators sometimes employ deception despite it conflicting with the ethical principle of acting with integrity?
In psychological research, utilizing deception is considered a straightforward violation of research integrity that is never justified under any scientific circumstances.
Dr. Vance wants to study how social exclusion affects cooperation. Because participants might behave unnaturally if they knew the true focus of the study, Dr. Vance plans to use deception by telling them they are playing a standard computer game with other online players, when they are actually playing against programmed computers.
Arrange the steps Dr. Vance must take in the correct chronological order to ethically design and execute this study.
Analyze the psychological research scenarios below. Match each scenario with its correct methodological or ethical classification regarding the use of deception.
An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is evaluating a research proposal on obedience to authority. The researcher wants to study how people respond to pressure from authority figures. In the proposed design, participants are led to believe they are administering a high-voltage, painful electric shock to a puppy behind a partition. Although no puppy is actually shocked, participants are expected to experience extreme anxiety, panic, and distress during the procedure.
In evaluating the ethicality of this design, the IRB must determine that this use of deception is ______ (permissible / impermissible) because psychological research guidelines strictly prohibit deceiving participants about procedures expected to cause severe emotional distress.
Match each term related to psychological research ethics and methodology with its correct description.
A psychological researcher decides to use deception in a study on social influence. Which of the following statements best illustrates the underlying trade-off the researcher must navigate when choosing to use deception?
Dr. Aris is designing a study to investigate how the presence of others affects a person's willingness to help. She tells participants they are taking part in a 'logical reasoning test' while a confederate in the next room pretends to fall and call for help. Because Dr. Aris intentionally misleads the participants about the true purpose and nature of the study, this research design is an application of deception in research.
A researcher is planning a study on conformity in group decision-making.
- Approach 1: The researcher informs participants: 'We are investigating whether you will change your correct answers to match the incorrect answers of the actors sitting next to you.'
- Approach 2: The researcher informs participants: 'We are investigating visual perception and group consensus on line lengths.'
When analyzing the methodological viability of these two approaches, the researcher must choose Approach 2 because disclosing the true nature of the study in Approach 1 would make the phenomenon of conformity ____ (difficult / easy / safe / ethical) or impossible to study accurately.
An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is evaluating a psychologist's research proposal that involves the use of deception. To make a systematic, ethical judgment on whether to approve the use of deception, the IRB must apply a series of evaluative filters in a logical sequence.
Arrange the steps of this ethical evaluation process in the correct order, from the initial threshold assessment of study value to the final post-participation safeguard.
What is the primary justification for using deception in psychological research, despite its conflict with the moral principle of acting with integrity?
Because it conflicts with the moral principle of acting with integrity, psychological researchers are never permitted to intentionally mislead participants about the nature of a study.
In psychological studies, ____ occurs when investigators intentionally mislead participants about the true nature or purpose of the research.
Match each research scenario or rationale to the concept it best illustrates regarding the use of deception in psychological research.
Deconstruct the rationale for using deception in psychological research. Arrange the following conceptual steps in the logical sequence a researcher must follow to justify and ethically evaluate the use of this method.
A research committee is evaluating several study proposals that involve deceiving participants. Based on the scientific justification for using deception, which of the following proposals provides the strongest rationale for intentionally misleading participants?
Employing deception in a psychological study inherently conflicts with which moral principle?
Dr. Alvey explicitly tells participants that her study investigates reading comprehension speeds. However, due to a malfunctioning timer, she accidentally records and informs a participant that they took 15 minutes instead of 10. Because the participant received false information, Dr. Alvey has employed deception in her research design.
Analyze the following research scenario: 'A psychologist wants to understand obedience to authority, but knows participants will alter their behavior if they know the study's true purpose. Therefore, the investigator intentionally misleads them by claiming the study tests a new learning method.' Match each component of the scenario (or its direct consequence) to the conceptual element of research deception it represents.
A student reviews a study on obedience to authority and argues that the research should be disregarded. The student claims, 'The investigators intentionally misled the participants about the purpose of the study. Because this conflicts with the moral principle of acting with integrity, the study has no scientific merit.' Based on the principles of deception in psychological research, how should this argument be evaluated?
Limit of Deception in Research
Example of Deception in Research