Learn Before
Suppose you are a researcher conducting a study comparing how reading from a digital screen versus a printed book affects comprehension. A participant has just completed the study in the digital screen condition. Write a brief 1- to 3-sentence debriefing explanation directed to this participant that fully satisfies the requirement of disclosing the research design.
Question: Suppose you are a researcher conducting a study comparing how reading from a digital screen versus a printed book affects comprehension. A participant has just completed the study in the digital screen condition. Write a brief 1- to 3-sentence debriefing explanation directed to this participant that fully satisfies the requirement of disclosing the research design.
Sample answer: In this study, we are investigating how the format of reading material affects text comprehension. While you completed the reading task on a digital screen, other participants read the same text from a printed book so that we can compare comprehension scores between the two formats.
Key points:
- State the primary research question clearly to the participant.
- Acknowledge the specific condition or variation the participant experienced.
- Explain the alternative experimental condition or variation that the participant did not personally experience.
Rubric: The response must be 1 to 3 sentences long and must apply the disclosure rule by including: 1) a statement of the primary research question (how reading format affects comprehension); 2) an explanation of the condition the participant experienced (reading on a digital screen); 3) an explanation of the condition they did not experience (reading a printed book) to reveal the complete design.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Example: Revealing Other Conditions During Debriefing
Revealing Other Conditions During Debriefing
When disclosing the research design during the debriefing phase, which of the following must researchers transparently reveal to participants?
Match each component of the research design disclosure with its role in the debriefing phase.
A researcher studying the 'Bystander Effect' assigns some participants to a 'large group' condition and others to an 'alone' condition. During the debriefing of a participant from the 'large group,' the researcher explains the hypothesis and the study's purpose but chooses not to mention that other participants performed the task while alone. True or False: This researcher has successfully fulfilled the requirement for 'Disclosing the Research Design.'
To effectively disclose the research design during debriefing, a researcher must help the participant understand how their specific task relates to the broader study. Arrange the following components of the disclosure in the logical order of increasing methodological scope (from the individual experience to the structural context).
During the debriefing phase of a psychological study, what is a researcher's obligation regarding the experimental conditions or variations that a participant did not personally experience?
When revealing the research design during debriefing, a researcher satisfies the transparency requirement by explaining the primary research question and the specific experimental condition the participant personally completed — even if the researcher does not describe the other experimental conditions that the participant never experienced.
In evaluating the ethical adequacy of a debriefing session, a researcher who explains the primary research question but omits descriptions of the experimental conditions that the participant did not personally experience has failed the requirement for complete _____ of the research design.
A researcher has just finished data collection and is preparing to debrief participants individually. Match each feature of the study to the specific disclosure action the researcher must take during the debriefing phase.
A researcher studies how background noise affects reading comprehension by randomly assigning participants to either a 'high-noise' or 'silent' condition. During debriefing, she clearly explains the study's primary research question but tells participants in the silent condition only about their own experience. By omitting a description of the high-noise condition, the researcher has failed to disclose _____, which is a required component of transparent methodological disclosure during debriefing.
A faculty supervisor asks a graduate student researcher to evaluate whether a completed debriefing session adequately met the ethical standard for disclosing the research design. Place the following evaluative steps in the order that best supports a systematic and defensible judgment about the debriefing's adequacy.
Identify and describe the two main elements of a study that a researcher is required to transparently reveal to participants during the debriefing phase, and explain the primary purpose of making this disclosure.
Explain why this debriefing session is incomplete based on the ethical requirements for disclosing the research design. What specific information did the researcher omit, and why does this omission prevent the participant from fully understanding their involvement?
Suppose you are a researcher conducting a study comparing how reading from a digital screen versus a printed book affects comprehension. A participant has just completed the study in the digital screen condition. Write a brief 1- to 3-sentence debriefing explanation directed to this participant that fully satisfies the requirement of disclosing the research design.