Learn Before
Suppose you are designing a research study to investigate whether childhood allowances promote adult financial responsibility. Apply the principles of scientific skepticism by stating one alternative explanation your study's design must measure, and describe the type of evidence you must collect to rule it out.
Question: Suppose you are designing a research study to investigate whether childhood allowances promote adult financial responsibility. Apply the principles of scientific skepticism by stating one alternative explanation your study's design must measure, and describe the type of evidence you must collect to rule it out.
Sample answer: The study must measure whether receiving an allowance leads to materialism or increased spending habits rather than financial responsibility. To rule this out, the study must collect systematically gathered empirical evidence comparing long-term financial behaviors and materialistic attitudes between adults who received allowances and those who did not.
Key points:
- Applying the concept of alternative explanations to design specific measures (materialism or spending).
- Applying the standard of systematically collected empirical evidence to the study's data collection methodology.
Rubric: The short answer must apply scientific skepticism to a research design by: 1) Specifying a relevant alternative explanation (e.g., materialism or spending habits). 2) Outlining the collection of systematically gathered empirical evidence (such as a comparison group or behavioral measures) to address that alternative.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
When applying scientific skepticism to the claim that giving children a weekly allowance teaches them financial responsibility, what does a skeptical researcher do before accepting this claim?
True or False: When applying scientific skepticism to the claim that child allowances build financial responsibility, a researcher should consider the possibility that allowances might instead teach children to become materialistic as a competing explanation.
A researcher is investigating the claim that giving children a weekly allowance helps them develop financial responsibility. Match each component of their skeptical investigation to its corresponding role in the scientific process.
A researcher is applying scientific skepticism to the claim that giving children a weekly allowance builds financial responsibility. Arrange the steps of this analytical process in the correct logical order, from the initial identification of the claim to the final decision on whether to accept it.
In the example of applying a skeptical approach to the claim that children's allowances build financial responsibility, which of the following is identified as a potential alternative explanation?
In the skeptical analysis of children's allowances, what is the significance of suggestions like 'teaching children to be materialistic' or 'merely teaching them to spend money'?
A researcher evaluates the claim that 'giving children a weekly allowance builds financial responsibility.' To apply scientific skepticism, the researcher must search for empirical evidence and consider _____ explanations—such as the possibility that an allowance merely teaches children to be materialistic—before accepting the claim.
A psychology student reads a popular parenting website claiming that children who receive weekly allowances grow up to be more financially responsible than those who do not. Applying scientific skepticism, the student concludes that the website's claim alone provides sufficient evidence to accept this practice as effective.
A research team is applying scientific skepticism to the claim that giving children a weekly allowance builds financial responsibility. Analyze each researcher action and match it to the specific component of scientific skepticism it best represents.
A researcher writes: 'Children in our study who received weekly allowances scored higher on a financial-responsibility measure than those who did not. However, families in the allowance group also enrolled their children in after-school money-management workshops. Until we rule out _____ explanations—such as the effect of those workshops—we cannot conclude that the allowance itself caused the improvement.' This judgment reflects sound scientific skepticism.
Recall the example of children's allowance discussed in the text. Describe the claim being questioned, the two specific alternative explanations that a skeptical approach considers, and what must be demanded before accepting the claim.
Explain how a reader would apply scientific skepticism to the advisor's claim. Why does understanding alternative explanations and empirical standards prevent the reader from immediately accepting this advice?
Suppose you are designing a research study to investigate whether childhood allowances promote adult financial responsibility. Apply the principles of scientific skepticism by stating one alternative explanation your study's design must measure, and describe the type of evidence you must collect to rule it out.