The 'Business as Usual' Scenario in the Stern Review
The 'business as usual' scenario, as outlined in the Stern Review, describes a situation where individuals, governments, and companies prioritize their own interests—such as pleasure, political goals, and profits—without adequately considering the external consequences of their actions on others, particularly future generations. The Review posits that the significant changes required for climate action cannot be achieved if this approach continues.
0
1
Tags
SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)
Biomedical Sciences
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
CORE Econ
Ch.4 Strategic interactions and social dilemmas - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Reinforcement of Stern Review's Conclusions by the IPCC (2014)
Early Action Strategies for Climate Change Mitigation
The 'Business as Usual' Scenario in the Stern Review
Discount Rate Calculation in the Stern Review
Criticism of the Stern Review's Low Discount Rate
The Employment Distribution Paradox
A landmark 2006 report on the economics of climate change concluded that the benefits of strong, early action to reduce emissions significantly outweigh the costs of inaction. This conclusion was heavily influenced by the use of a very low discount rate, which values the welfare of future generations at nearly the same level as the current generation. Which of the following statements represents the most significant economic criticism of this methodology?
Evaluating Long-Term Environmental Policy
A major 2006 economic report on climate change advocated for immediate, large-scale investment to prevent future environmental damage. Its cost-benefit analysis was based on a low discount rate, which gave significant weight to the welfare of future generations. Which of the following best describes the two primary justifications for the specific discount rate used in this report?
An economic analysis is conducted to evaluate a large-scale, long-term environmental protection project. The project requires significant upfront investment but is expected to yield substantial benefits for society 100 years in the future. Two different approaches are considered for the analysis:
- Approach 1: Uses a low discount rate to calculate the present value of future benefits.
- Approach 2: Uses a high discount rate to calculate the present value of future benefits.
Which of the following outcomes is the most likely result of these different approaches?
Evaluating Climate Policy Proposals
A landmark 2006 economic report on climate change presented a powerful argument for immediate action based on a specific cost-benefit analysis. Match each element of the report's methodology and findings to its correct description.
The Economic Rationale for Climate Action
A government is debating a new policy that would impose significant, immediate costs on the economy to fund large-scale projects aimed at reducing carbon emissions over the next century. A critic argues, 'It is economically irresponsible to spend so much now to prevent problems that are far in the future. We should focus on more immediate economic needs.' Based on the central conclusion of a landmark 2006 economic analysis of climate change, which of the following statements provides the strongest counter-argument?
A landmark 2006 economic analysis of climate change justified discounting the value of future environmental benefits, in part, by assuming that future generations will be significantly wealthier and thus a marginal dollar will be worth less to them. An opponent of this view argues that this specific justification is ethically flawed when applied to irreversible climate impacts. Which of the following statements best supports the opponent's ethical argument?
A major 2006 economic report on climate change advocated for immediate, large-scale investment to prevent future environmental damage. Its cost-benefit analysis was based on a low discount rate, which gave significant weight to the welfare of future generations. Which of the following best describes the two primary justifications for the specific discount rate used in this report?
Learn After
Corporate Decision-Making and Future Consequences
A national government decides to approve the construction of several new coal-fired power plants. The primary justifications are to provide cheap electricity to spur immediate industrial growth and to secure political support before an upcoming election. The long-term environmental impacts and consequences for future generations are acknowledged in reports but are not given significant weight in the final decision. This government's action is a clear example of which of the following economic approaches to climate change?
The 'Business as Usual' Dilemma
Analyzing the 'Business as Usual' Framework
Analyzing the 'Business as Usual' Framework
A central criticism of the 'business as usual' approach to economic policy is its inadequacy in addressing large-scale, long-term environmental problems. From an economic perspective, what is the fundamental flaw of this approach?
The 'business as usual' scenario, as a concept in climate economics, assumes that individuals and firms will naturally adjust their behavior to prioritize long-term environmental sustainability over short-term profits without the need for significant external policy intervention.
Match each economic actor with the behavior that best describes their contribution to a 'business as usual' scenario, where long-term environmental consequences are not adequately considered.
An argument often made against immediate, large-scale climate action is that it imposes significant economic costs on the current generation to benefit future generations, who are expected to be wealthier and have better technology. From the perspective of the 'business as usual' scenario as a framework for understanding climate inaction, what is the most significant flaw in this argument?
A coastal city government is presented with scientific projections indicating a significant increase in the frequency and severity of flooding over the next 50 years. Which of the following policy decisions would be most characteristic of a 'business as usual' approach to this challenge?
The 'Business as Usual' Dilemma