The Ethics of Line-Standing
Analyze this scenario. Explain why paying someone to hold a place in line for a public hearing might be viewed as a 'repugnant transaction' by some, even though the act of waiting in line is not inherently wrong and paying for services is a normal market activity.
0
1
Tags
SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19)
Biomedical Sciences
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
Analysis in Bloom's Taxonomy
CORE Econ
Economy
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
Related
Further example where transactions became repugnant with the addition of money: Dwarf Tossing
Controversy Surrounding Commercial Surrogacy
Global Prohibition of Human Organ Sales
In many societies, donating a kidney to a stranger is celebrated as a selfless act of altruism. In contrast, establishing a legal, open market where individuals can sell their kidneys for cash is almost universally banned. Which of the following statements best analyzes the fundamental reason for this sharp distinction in social and legal acceptance?
Civic Duty for Sale?
The Ethics of Line-Standing
The Price of Friendship
A Nobel Prize winner decides to sell their medal at an auction. This action is met with widespread public criticism, with many arguing it devalues the honor and the achievement it represents. In contrast, an individual selling a rare, historically significant coin for a high price is generally seen as a standard, acceptable market transaction. Which of the following statements best analyzes the fundamental distinction that causes the medal sale to be viewed as inappropriate or 'repugnant' while the coin sale is not?
Match each transaction with the primary ethical principle it would violate if money were introduced, leading to social disapproval.
Evaluating the Monetization of Civic Duty
The primary objection to creating a legal market for buying and selling votes in a national election is based on the economic argument that such a market would be inefficient in reflecting the true preferences of the electorate.
Match each transaction scenario with the description that best explains why it is, or is not, typically considered a 'repugnant' transaction.
The Professional Best Man
Voluntary Exchange or Human Dignity?
The Price of Companionship
A community blood drive that starts offering a cash payment to donors, only to find that donations decrease and public criticism increases, is an example of a transaction becoming repugnant due to the introduction of a monetary incentive.
The Moral Limits of Markets
Incentivizing Emergency Response
The Queue Economy
Which of the following scenarios best illustrates the principle that introducing a direct monetary payment for an activity can transform it from a valued act into one that is considered inappropriate or 'repugnant' by some?
A university traditionally gives a prestigious, non-monetary award for 'Student Volunteer of the Year' to recognize outstanding community service. The administration proposes replacing the certificate of honor with a $5,000 cash prize to better reward the winner's efforts. Based on the economic principle that adding money can alter the nature of a transaction, what is the most likely unintended consequence of this change?
Evaluating a Monetary Incentive for Foster Care
A city is debating two policies to reduce traffic. Policy 1 is a standard congestion fee, charging drivers to enter the downtown area during peak hours. Policy 2 offers a significant cash payment to citizens who voluntarily and permanently surrender their driver's licenses. While both policies use money to influence behavior, Policy 2 is more likely to be met with public opposition on the grounds that it is a 'repugnant transaction.' Which of the following best explains the core reason for this distinction?