The Impact of Market Entry on Collusive Pricing
Initially, a market is served by only two firms. These firms have found that by both maintaining a high price, they can each secure substantial profits. However, if one firm lowers its price while the other maintains a high price, the low-pricing firm captures a much larger market share and earns even higher profits, while the high-pricing firm's profits plummet. If both lower their prices, they both end up with low profits.
Now, imagine several new firms enter this market. Analyze how this influx of new competitors fundamentally changes the strategic decision-making for the two original firms regarding their pricing. Explain why their original high-price cooperative strategy is likely to become unstable and collapse.
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.8 Supply and demand: Markets with many buyers and sellers - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Analysis in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
Related
Strategic Pricing in a Changing Market
Consider a market where a small number of firms have been able to maintain high prices by implicitly agreeing not to undercut each other. If several new firms enter this market, why does this situation often destabilize, leading to widespread price cuts?
The Impact of Market Entry on Collusive Pricing
Consider a market where a few firms have successfully maintained high prices through a cooperative agreement. If several new firms enter this market, the cooperative agreement is likely to fail. This failure occurs primarily because the new entrants are typically more aggressive and willing to set lower prices to gain market share.
The Stability of Cooperative Pricing
Initially, two firms are the only competitors in a market. They can each choose to set a high price or a low price. If both set a high price, they each earn a substantial profit. If one sets a low price while the other sets a high price, the low-pricing firm captures most of the market and earns a very large profit, while the high-pricing firm earns very little. If both set a low price, they both earn a small profit. Now, imagine several new firms enter this market. How does the entry of these new competitors most likely alter the strategic decision-making for the original firms?
Initially, two firms in a market can each choose to set a 'High Price' or a 'Low Price'. If both set a High Price, they successfully coordinate and each earns $50 million. If both set a Low Price, they compete and each earns $10 million. If one sets a Low Price while the other sets a High Price, the low-pricer earns $60 million and the high-pricer earns only $5 million. Now, several new competitors enter the market. This new entry changes the potential profits for the original two firms. Which of the following new payoff structures best illustrates why the original firms would now abandon their high-price strategy and cut prices?
Two large firms, Firm A and Firm B, have been the only sellers in a market, successfully maintaining high prices through an unspoken agreement. A third firm, Firm C, is now entering the market. Which of the following statements provides the most accurate economic explanation for why the entry of Firm C makes it much more likely that the high-price agreement between Firm A and Firm B will collapse?
Incentive Shift in a Cartel
A market initially has only two firms that successfully cooperate to keep prices high. After several new firms enter, the market dynamics change. Match each term to the description that best fits its role in this transformation.
The Three-Firm Price-Setting Game as a Prisoners' Dilemma