The Incentive to Defect
Two competing surf shops, 'BeachFun' and 'SunSurf', operate in a market where customers have no brand loyalty and always choose the shop with the lower price for the day. The shops are considering an informal, non-binding agreement to both set a 'High' price, which would earn each of them $4,000. However, if one shop secretly sets a 'Low' price while the other honors the 'High' price agreement, the low-pricing shop earns $6,000 and the high-pricing shop earns only $500. Analyze the situation from the perspective of a single shop owner. Explain why, despite the potential for a good collective outcome ($4,000 each), there is a powerful incentive for an individual shop to break the agreement in this one-time scenario.
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
CORE Econ
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Strategic Pricing Decision
Two food delivery apps, 'QuickEats' and 'FastBites', are the only competitors in a small city. Customers are highly price-sensitive and will always choose the app with the lower service fee for that day. If both apps set the same fee, they split the market evenly. The table below shows the daily profits for each company based on their decision to set fees 'High' or 'Low'.
FastBites: High Fee FastBites: Low Fee QuickEats: High Fee ($4000, $4000) ($500, $6000) QuickEats: Low Fee ($6000, $500) ($2000, $2000) (Payoffs are listed as: QuickEats, FastBites) Based on an analysis of this payoff matrix for a single day's decision, which statement best describes the strategic situation?
The Logic of Price Undercutting
Evaluating Outcomes in a Price-Sensitive Market
In a market with two competing firms and customers who have very low brand loyalty and always choose the cheaper option, if both firms independently conclude that their best individual strategy is to set a low price regardless of the other firm's choice, this situation will ultimately lead to the highest possible combined profits for the two firms.
Two companies, 'AquaRide' and 'WaveJet', are the sole providers of jet ski rentals on a popular beach. Most tourists have no brand loyalty and will rent from whichever company offers a lower price for the day. If prices are equal, they split the market. Each company must decide whether to set a 'High' price or a 'Low' price. Match each strategic scenario or concept to its correct description within this context.
In a pricing game involving two firms with highly price-sensitive customers, each firm independently calculates that setting a low price is its best individual strategy, no matter what the competitor chooses. The resulting stable outcome, where both firms set a low price and neither can benefit by unilaterally changing their decision, is known as a(n) ____________.
You are the manager of 'WindRiders', one of two competing kitesurfing rental shops on a beach. Your only competitor is 'SurfNSea'. Most customers are tourists with no brand preference; they will always rent from the shop offering the lower price for the day. If prices are identical, you split the customers evenly. You must decide whether to set a 'High' or 'Low' price. Arrange the following steps to reflect the logical reasoning process that leads you to your final pricing decision in this one-time interaction.
Two competing surf shops, 'Beachside Boards' and 'Coastal Waves', are the only rental options on a popular beach. Customers are tourists who are highly price-sensitive and show no brand loyalty, always choosing the cheaper rental. The owner of Beachside Boards calls the owner of Coastal Waves and says, 'This price war is hurting us both. Let's make a gentlemen's agreement to both set high prices tomorrow. We'll both make more money.' Assuming this agreement is informal and not legally binding, which of the following represents the most astute evaluation of this proposal from the perspective of Coastal Waves for that single day?
The Incentive to Defect