Learn Before
Two Criteria for Judgment
When judging an economic outcome, one can focus on whether the total benefits are as large as possible, or one can focus on how those benefits are shared among the individuals involved. Explain the fundamental difference between these two standards of judgment and identify which one relates to the concept of fairness.
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
CORE Econ
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.7 The firm and its customers - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Analysis in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
Related
Unfair Division of Found Money
A company has an unexpectedly profitable year and its board must decide how to allocate a $1 million surplus. The board is considering four different plans. Which of the following plans is most clearly guided by a judgment about the fairness of the outcome, rather than by other economic considerations?
Negotiating with a Sole Employer
An economic outcome is considered fair if it is impossible to make one person better off without making another person worse off.
Two Criteria for Judgment
Evaluating a National Production Strategy
Match each economic scenario with the primary criterion—fairness or efficiency—that is most relevant for its evaluation.
Perspectives on Fairness in Public Funding
When evaluating an economic allocation, economists consider not only whether the outcome is efficient but also its ______, which is a judgment based on a particular conception of justice.
An economist is tasked with evaluating the overall desirability of a new public policy that changes how a city's resources are distributed. Arrange the following steps in the logical order an economist would follow to conduct a comprehensive evaluation.
Allocating Community Garden Plots