Understanding and Reducing the Spread of Misinformation Online
This study looks at how willing social media users are to share misinformation or unbelievable content, finding that users are often able to distinguish what is true and untrue, but often fail to first consider this before sharing. Because of this, they find nudging to be a good strategy for pushing users to consider whether information is true or false before sharing.
0
1
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences
Related
Social Media COVID-19 Misinformation Interventions Viewed Positively, But Have Limited Impact
The implied truth effect: Attaching warnings to a subset of fake news headlines increases perceived accuracy of headlines without warnings
Two Truths and a Lie: Exploring Soft Moderation of COVID-19 Misinformation with Amazon Alexa
“I Won the Election!”: An Empirical Analysis of Soft Moderation Interventions on Twitter
You’re definitely wrong, maybe: Correction style has minimal effect on corrections of misinformation online
Mobilizing Users: Does Exposure to Misinformation and Its Correction Affect Users’ Responses to a Health Misinformation Post?
Trustworthy misinformation mitigation with soft information nudging
Community-Based Fact-Checking on Twitter's Birdwatch Platform
Nudge Effect of Fact-Check Alerts: Source Influence and Media Skepticism on Sharing of News Misinformation in Social Media
Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention
FeedReflect: A Tool for Nudging Users to Assess News Credibility on Twitter
Exploring lightweight interventions at posting time to reduce the sharing of misinformation on social media
Understanding and Reducing the Spread of Misinformation Online
Diffusion and persistence of false rumors in social media networks: implications of searchability on rumor self-correction on Twitter
Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online
Privacy Nudges for Social Media: An Exploratory Facebook Study
Field experiments on social media
Political fact-checking on Twitter: When do corrections have an effect?
Social correction across party lines in a Twitter field experiment
Perverse Downstream Consequences of Debunking: Being Corrected by Another User for Posting False Political News Increases Subsequent Sharing of Low Quality, Partisan, and Toxic Content in a Twitter Field Experiment
SMS advertising: How message relevance is linked to the attitude toward the brand?