Learn Before
Using Error Review to Guide Feature Design
Insights from error review can point to new input features that address a specific pattern of mistakes. Adding those features may lower both bias and variance. If the added features make variance rise in practice, regularization usually can offset that increase.
0
1
Tags
Machine Learning
Deep Learning
Supervised Learning
Dive into Deep Learning @ D2L
Data Science
Machine Learning Strategy
Machine Learning Yearning @ DeepLearning.AI
Related
Using Error Review to Guide Feature Design
Using Less Regularization to Ease Underfitting
Which change is most likely to reduce avoidable bias when a model is underfitting?
More training data and avoidable bias
A way to lower avoidable bias is to reduce or eliminate ____.
Match each action with its main effect or purpose.
Order the response to weak training-set performance.
How can four bias-reduction tactics help when a model underfits?
Fixing poor training-set performance in a model
Why can weakening regularization help a model that is underfitting?
Which choice best applies error analysis to reduce avoidable bias?
Changing a model’s architecture can affect both bias and variance.
Learn After
What should you do if adding new features raises variance?
Do Newly Added Inputs Affect Only One Source of Error?
Improving Features from _____ Findings
Roles in Adding New Features
Steps for Adding a New Feature After Error Review
Why Extra Features Can Backfire Temporarily
Reducing Variance After Adding Diagnostic Features
Purpose of New Inputs After Review
How Error Analysis Can Shape New Features
Regularization Can Offset Added Variance