Learn Before
A clinical psychologist publishes an article asserting that a new therapy reduces anxiety. When a qualified colleague asks for the raw scores to verify the therapy's statistical significance, the psychologist refuses to share the data. Explain why this refusal is an ethical issue and identify the specific scientific safeguard that is compromised.
Question: A clinical psychologist publishes an article asserting that a new therapy reduces anxiety. When a qualified colleague asks for the raw scores to verify the therapy's statistical significance, the psychologist refuses to share the data. Explain why this refusal is an ethical issue and identify the specific scientific safeguard that is compromised.
Sample answer: The psychologist's refusal is an ethical issue because researchers are ethically expected to share their data with other professionals under the principle of scholarly integrity. By withholding the raw scores, the psychologist compromises the safeguard of independent verification, preventing others from validating the findings and undermining scientific transparency.
Key points:
- Refusing to share data violates the ethical expectation of scholarly integrity
- The scientific safeguard of independent verification is compromised
- Withholding data blocks the peer verification process
- The action undermines transparency and collaboration in the scientific community
Rubric: The response must explain that the refusal violates the ethical expectation of data sharing linked to scholarly integrity. It must specifically identify the compromise of independent verification (or validation of findings/claims).
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
According to the principles of scholarly integrity, why are researchers ethically expected to share their data with other professionals?
Match each benefit of data sharing in psychological research with the scenario that best illustrates it.
A psychology researcher has published a peer-reviewed study on social influence. When a qualified colleague requests the raw data to verify the findings, the researcher refuses, arguing that the peer-review process has already provided sufficient verification of the results. This refusal is consistent with the ethical principle of data sharing.
Analyze the logical sequence of events in the scientific verification process. Arrange the following steps to show how the ethical principle of data sharing facilitates the validation of psychological research.
According to the principles of psychological research ethics, the expectation that researchers make their raw data available to other professionals for the purpose of verifying findings is a core component of which principle?
In psychological research, the principle of data sharing implies that researchers should keep their raw data private to ensure that their findings are protected from being challenged or verified by other professionals.
When critiquing a researcher's claims of discovery, the scientific community uses the ethical principle of data sharing as a benchmark to ensure that the findings are open to independent _____, which is a necessary standard for maintaining the integrity and transparency of psychological science.
A research methods professor presents four researcher decisions involving data-sharing requests made after publication. Match each decision to the data-sharing principle it correctly reflects or violates under APA Standard 8.14 and scholarly integrity.
Analyzing the distinct roles of peer review and data sharing in the research process reveals that they serve different verification functions: whereas peer review evaluates the quality of a manuscript before publication, data sharing enables independent _____ of the underlying dataset after publication, which is why both practices are considered necessary components of scholarly integrity.
A researcher receives a written request from a qualified colleague for access to the raw data from a recently published study. Arrange the following evaluative steps in the order the researcher should apply them to reach a justified ethical decision, from the first criterion to assess through the final action.
According to the principle of scholarly integrity, what is the ethical expectation regarding researchers and their data, and what primary purposes does meeting this expectation serve within the scientific community?
Based on the principle of scholarly integrity in psychological research, how should Dr. Smith address Dr. Jones's request, and what would be the consequence of denying it?
A clinical psychologist publishes an article asserting that a new therapy reduces anxiety. When a qualified colleague asks for the raw scores to verify the therapy's statistical significance, the psychologist refuses to share the data. Explain why this refusal is an ethical issue and identify the specific scientific safeguard that is compromised.