Learn Before
Based on the principle of scholarly integrity in psychological research, how should Dr. Smith address Dr. Jones's request, and what would be the consequence of denying it?
Case context: Dr. Smith has recently published a groundbreaking study on the cognitive effects of sleep deprivation in peer-reviewed journals. Dr. Jones, a researcher from another university, contacts Dr. Smith requesting the raw dataset to perform a reanalysis of the findings. Dr. Smith is reluctant to share the data, citing the effort it took to gather it and a preference to keep it private.
Question: Based on the principle of scholarly integrity in psychological research, how should Dr. Smith address Dr. Jones's request, and what would be the consequence of denying it?
Sample answer: Dr. Smith should share the raw dataset with Dr. Jones. Ethically, researchers must make their data available to other professionals to allow verification of their findings. Denying the request violates the principle of scholarly integrity, blocks the verification of scientific claims, and hinders transparency and collaboration in the scientific community.
Key points:
- Dr. Smith is ethically expected to share the raw dataset with Dr. Jones
- Withholding data violates the principle of scholarly integrity
- Sharing data is necessary to allow other professionals to verify the findings
- Withholding data prevents scientific transparency
- Withholding data impedes collaboration within the scientific community
Rubric: The student must state that Dr. Smith should share the data with Dr. Jones. The explanation must connect this decision to the ethical expectation of sharing data for verification, noting that withholding data violates scholarly integrity and undermines scientific transparency and collaboration.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
According to the principles of scholarly integrity, why are researchers ethically expected to share their data with other professionals?
Match each benefit of data sharing in psychological research with the scenario that best illustrates it.
A psychology researcher has published a peer-reviewed study on social influence. When a qualified colleague requests the raw data to verify the findings, the researcher refuses, arguing that the peer-review process has already provided sufficient verification of the results. This refusal is consistent with the ethical principle of data sharing.
Analyze the logical sequence of events in the scientific verification process. Arrange the following steps to show how the ethical principle of data sharing facilitates the validation of psychological research.
According to the principles of psychological research ethics, the expectation that researchers make their raw data available to other professionals for the purpose of verifying findings is a core component of which principle?
In psychological research, the principle of data sharing implies that researchers should keep their raw data private to ensure that their findings are protected from being challenged or verified by other professionals.
When critiquing a researcher's claims of discovery, the scientific community uses the ethical principle of data sharing as a benchmark to ensure that the findings are open to independent _____, which is a necessary standard for maintaining the integrity and transparency of psychological science.
A research methods professor presents four researcher decisions involving data-sharing requests made after publication. Match each decision to the data-sharing principle it correctly reflects or violates under APA Standard 8.14 and scholarly integrity.
Analyzing the distinct roles of peer review and data sharing in the research process reveals that they serve different verification functions: whereas peer review evaluates the quality of a manuscript before publication, data sharing enables independent _____ of the underlying dataset after publication, which is why both practices are considered necessary components of scholarly integrity.
A researcher receives a written request from a qualified colleague for access to the raw data from a recently published study. Arrange the following evaluative steps in the order the researcher should apply them to reach a justified ethical decision, from the first criterion to assess through the final action.
According to the principle of scholarly integrity, what is the ethical expectation regarding researchers and their data, and what primary purposes does meeting this expectation serve within the scientific community?
Based on the principle of scholarly integrity in psychological research, how should Dr. Smith address Dr. Jones's request, and what would be the consequence of denying it?
A clinical psychologist publishes an article asserting that a new therapy reduces anxiety. When a qualified colleague asks for the raw scores to verify the therapy's statistical significance, the psychologist refuses to share the data. Explain why this refusal is an ethical issue and identify the specific scientific safeguard that is compromised.