Multiple Choice

A peer reviewer is evaluating a research manuscript. The authors recruited 100 university students from an introductory course to test a new reading strategy. The authors randomly drew student names from a hat to place half into a new strategy group and half into a traditional reading group. In their conclusion, the authors state that their study utilized a 'representative sample' and that the new strategy caused better comprehension because the groups were 'comparable'. How should the reviewer critically evaluate these specific methodological claims?

0

1

Updated 2026-06-15

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related