A psychologist wants to test whether motivational bias explains why some individuals reject scientific evidence showing that calorie-reducing diets are ineffective for long-term weight management. The psychologist measures each participant's self-reported need for hope regarding weight loss before presenting them with the scientific evidence. Based on the concept of motivational bias, what relationship should the psychologist predict between a participant's need for hope and their likelihood of rejecting the scientific evidence?
Question: A psychologist wants to test whether motivational bias explains why some individuals reject scientific evidence showing that calorie-reducing diets are ineffective for long-term weight management. The psychologist measures each participant's self-reported need for hope regarding weight loss before presenting them with the scientific evidence. Based on the concept of motivational bias, what relationship should the psychologist predict between a participant's need for hope and their likelihood of rejecting the scientific evidence?
Sample answer: The psychologist should predict a positive relationship where participants with a higher need for hope are more likely to reject the scientific evidence. This is because the belief in the effectiveness of dieting is maintained to preserve their hope for weight loss, so those who rely more on this hope will be more motivated to resist and reject contradictory scientific facts.
Key points:
- Predict that a higher need for hope correlates with a higher likelihood of rejecting scientific evidence.
- Apply the concept of motivational bias to explain that the belief is maintained to satisfy the psychological need for hope.
- Demonstrate how the underlying motivation (hope) drives the cognitive rejection of contradictory scientific data.
Rubric: The answer should predict that individuals with a higher need for hope are more likely to reject the scientific evidence. It should explain this prediction by applying the mechanism of motivational bias: the belief is maintained to protect the psychological need for hope, leading those with high hope requirements to actively reject contradictory scientific findings.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
People continue to believe that calorie-reducing diets are an effective long-term treatment for obesity primarily because the scientific evidence strongly supports this claim.
The persistent belief that calorie-reducing diets are an effective long-term treatment for obesity—despite scientific evidence to the contrary—is often cited as an example of motivational bias. Which of the following best explains the 'motivational' component of this bias?
A student in a research methods class is presented with a peer-reviewed meta-analysis showing that calorie-reducing diets are ineffective for long-term weight management. Despite the data, the student rejects the findings, stating that the belief in these diets provides them with a 'necessary sense of self-discipline.' Match each component of the student's reaction to the corresponding element of motivational bias.
Analyze the psychological mechanism of motivational bias by ordering the stages an individual goes through when rejecting scientific findings about the long-term failure of calorie-reducing diets.
Scientific evidence generally contradicts the claim that calorie-reducing diets are an effective long-term treatment for obesity. According to the psychological concept of motivational bias, why do many people continue to believe in the effectiveness of these diets?
Categorizing the belief in calorie-reducing diets as a 'motivational bias' implies that the error in judgment is primarily driven by psychological desires, such as the need for hope, rather than by a simple lack of access to scientific evidence.
A student reads a scientifically sound study showing that calorie-reducing diets are ineffective for long-term weight maintenance. The student dismisses the results, arguing that the 'hope' for weight loss provided by the diet is more important than the empirical data. This prioritization of psychological needs over empirical evidence when judging the value of research is an example of _____ bias.
A research methods instructor uses the calorie-reducing diet example to illustrate motivational bias. Match each component of this example to its correct description.
Analyzing the calorie-reducing diet example reveals that motivational bias operates through two distinct psychological mechanisms for two different groups. For individuals with obesity, the bias is sustained by the hope of losing weight; for individuals without obesity, the bias is sustained by feelings of pride in their own _____.
A student wants to evaluate whether a popular media claim—'calorie-reducing diets are the best long-term solution for obesity'—reflects motivational bias rather than genuine scientific consensus. Place the following steps in the correct order for conducting this evaluation.
Describe how the belief in calorie-reducing diets as an effective long-term treatment for obesity serves as an example of motivational bias. In your explanation, state what scientific research reveals about this belief, and recall the specific psychological factors that lead people to persist in it despite the evidence.
Diagnose the psychological phenomenon demonstrated by these participants. Explain why their persistent belief in the long-term effectiveness of calorie-reducing diets, despite their own repeated personal failures and scientific evidence to the contrary, is categorized as a motivational bias.
A psychologist wants to test whether motivational bias explains why some individuals reject scientific evidence showing that calorie-reducing diets are ineffective for long-term weight management. The psychologist measures each participant's self-reported need for hope regarding weight loss before presenting them with the scientific evidence. Based on the concept of motivational bias, what relationship should the psychologist predict between a participant's need for hope and their likelihood of rejecting the scientific evidence?