Learn Before
A research manuscript is submitted to a scientific journal. The study described is methodologically sound, the data analysis is correct, and the paper is clearly written. However, the experiment is an exact replication of a well-established study from ten years prior and offers no new variables, populations, or insights. Based on the primary functions of the scientific review process, what is the most compelling reason this manuscript would be rejected?
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
OpenStax
Psychology @ OpenStax
Ch.2 Psychological Research - Psychology @ OpenStax
Introduction to Psychology @ OpenStax Course
OpenStax Psychology (2nd ed.) Textbook
Psychology
Analysis in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Related
A research manuscript is submitted to a scientific journal. The study described is methodologically sound, the data analysis is correct, and the paper is clearly written. However, the experiment is an exact replication of a well-established study from ten years prior and offers no new variables, populations, or insights. Based on the primary functions of the scientific review process, what is the most compelling reason this manuscript would be rejected?
Replication of Studies in Psychology