Replication of Studies in Psychology
In psychological research, replication involves repeating another scientist's experiment, often using new samples, to assess the reliability of the original findings. Because any single study carries a risk of reflecting a Type I or Type II error, researchers must be cautious when interpreting isolated results. Each successful replication of a study that produces a similar outcome provides increasing confidence that the finding represents a genuine, real-world phenomenon rather than a statistical artifact.
0
1
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
OpenStax
Psychology @ OpenStax
Ch.2 Psychological Research - Psychology @ OpenStax
Introduction to Psychology @ OpenStax Course
OpenStax Psychology (2nd ed.) Textbook
Psychology
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
A research manuscript is submitted to a scientific journal. The study described is methodologically sound, the data analysis is correct, and the paper is clearly written. However, the experiment is an exact replication of a well-established study from ten years prior and offers no new variables, populations, or insights. Based on the primary functions of the scientific review process, what is the most compelling reason this manuscript would be rejected?
Replication of Studies in Psychology
American Psychological Association (APA) Publication Manual
Comparison of Scientific Journals and Popular Psychology Magazines
Replication of Studies in Psychology
A primary reason psychologists publish their research findings in journals or present them at conferences is to allow other researchers to replicate the studies or build upon the results.
A psychologist has just completed a study on social behavior. Arrange the steps of the research dissemination process in the correct order to show how findings move from a private project to the broader scientific community.
Dr. Martinez has just completed a three-year study on how bilingualism affects cognitive flexibility in elderly adults. If her goal is to allow the broader scientific community to independently verify her results and build upon her findings, which action should she take next?
Analyze the different roles of dissemination components in the scientific process. Match each dissemination method or reporting practice with the specific way it facilitates the advancement of psychology as a science.
As you design a new 'Dissemination Checklist' for a research laboratory, which set of requirements would best achieve the goal of contributing to the collective understanding of the field by allowing others to replicate your work and build upon your findings?
Match each term related to the sharing of psychological findings with its corresponding description.
The scientific community can effectively build upon a new discovery even if the original researcher does not formally disseminate the findings, as long as the discovery itself is groundbreaking.
After completing a study on stress and decision-making, a psychologist submits a manuscript to a peer-reviewed journal so other researchers can replicate the work and build on the results. This critical final step of the research process is called _____.
A cognitive psychologist completes an experiment on study habits but decides to write about the findings only in a popular science blog, omitting the detailed methodology. By bypassing formal dissemination channels like journals or conferences, the researcher prevents the scientific community from conducting direct _____ of the study, which is essential to verify the reliability of the findings and build upon them.
To evaluate the validity of a novel psychological claim and establish it as accepted scientific knowledge, the scientific community must subject it to levels of public scrutiny and verification. Order the following steps in the dissemination and verification process, from the initial private project completion to the integration of the findings into the collective understanding of the field.
File Drawer Problem
p-hacking
Replication of Studies in Psychology
Example of Type I and Type II Errors
In null hypothesis testing, which of the following best defines a Type I error?
A researcher evaluates a new cognitive training program that, in reality, has no effect on memory. Due to an unusual sample, the statistical analysis produces a significant result, causing the researcher to incorrectly conclude that the program works. This situation describes a Type I error.
To understand a Type I error, one must distinguish between the true state of the population and the decision made by the researcher. Match each component of a Type I error to the description that best explains its role.
A Type I error is the result of a specific logical failure during the hypothesis-testing process. Arrange the following events in the correct order to illustrate the progression of a Type I error, starting from the actual state of the population to the researcher's final conclusion.
You are designing a computer simulation to help students visualize the logic of statistical decision-making in psychology. To successfully create a scenario where the software can generate a Type I error, which combination of population characteristics and decision rules must you program into the model?
In psychological research, a Type I error is also known as a 'false positive.'
A researcher must decide between two significance levels for a study on a new behavioral therapy. They evaluate the trade-offs and conclude that it is more damaging to give patients 'false hope' with a treatment that does not work than to miss a potentially helpful therapy. To align with this evaluation, the researcher selects a lower level to minimize the probability of a _____.
Replication of Studies in Psychology
Which of the following statements accurately defines a Type II error in null hypothesis testing?
If a researcher conducts a study with a small sample size and concludes there is no significant effect—even though a true relationship actually exists in the population—they have committed a Type II error.
A researcher is studying whether a new mindfulness app reduces stress. In reality, the app is highly effective. However, because the study only includes 10 participants, the researcher fails to find a statistically significant result and concludes the app does not work. Match each component of this scenario with the correct statistical concept.
Arrange the following events in the correct logical order to illustrate the causal chain of a Type II error, starting from the population reality and ending with the researcher's final conclusion.
You are designing a new clinical study to test if a specific nutrient supplement has a subtle, positive effect on cognitive recall in elderly participants. Because the expected effect size is small and the recruitment pool is limited, your primary goal is to propose a research design that minimizes the probability of a Type II error. Which of the following research plans best synthesizes methodological and statistical strategies to maximize your power to detect this effect?
A researcher is designing a study where failing to detect a true treatment effect would have much more dangerous consequences than accidentally claiming an effect exists. If the researcher prioritizes participant safety by specifically trying to minimize the risk of missing a real relationship that exists in the population, they are making a value judgment to focus on reducing the probability of a(n) _____ error.
In the context of statistical testing, a Type II error—which occurs when a researcher fails to detect an effect that actually exists—is also referred to as a _____ negative.
Types of Reliability
A team of researchers develops a new questionnaire designed to measure an individual's level of creativity. Which of the following outcomes would provide the strongest evidence that the new questionnaire is reliable?
A research team develops a new observational checklist to measure 'attentive behavior' in preschoolers. Two different researchers use the checklist to observe the same child at the same time, but their final scores for the child's attentiveness are completely different. When this process is repeated with other children, the two researchers' scores continue to show no relationship to each other. Based on this information, what is the most significant problem with this new checklist?
Replication of Studies in Psychology
Alfred Binet's Intelligence Test
Standardization
In psychological research, what does the reliability of a measurement tool refer to?
A researcher administers a newly developed intelligence test to a group of students and then re-administers it to the same group a week later under the same conditions. If the students' scores are significantly different between the two administrations, the test is demonstrating high reliability.
In psychological research, reliability manifests in several ways. Match each research scenario with the specific type of consistency (or lack thereof) it demonstrates.
A research team is evaluating the reliability of a new 'Social Anxiety Scale' to determine if it is stable enough for use in a long-term clinical study. Arrange the following findings in order, from the result that provides the least support for the tool's consistency to the result that provides the most robust evidence for its stability over time.
In the context of psychological research, what is the primary characteristic of a 'reliable' measurement tool, such as an intelligence assessment?
In psychological research, reliability involves maintaining consistency under different conditions. Match each term with the scenario or description that best illustrates it.
A researcher is evaluating a new intelligence assessment. A student takes the test on Monday and scores . On Tuesday, under identical conditions and with no changes in the student's cognitive state, the student takes the test again and scores . By analyzing the discrepancy between these two results for a stable trait, the researcher concludes that the assessment lacks _____.
A clinical psychologist administers a new spatial reasoning test to a group of participants on Monday, and then administers the exact same test to the same participants on Friday under identical conditions. If the participants receive almost identical scores on both administrations, this outcome demonstrates that the spatial reasoning test is reliable.
A research team evaluates a new diagnostic checklist. When Psychologist A uses the checklist to evaluate a patient, they diagnose them with mild depression, but when Psychologist B evaluates the same patient on the same day using the same checklist, they diagnose them with severe anxiety. Analyzing these discrepant outcomes suggests that the diagnostic checklist lacks _____.
A psychologist is evaluating the results of test-retest administrations for four experimental intelligence assessment tools. Evaluate the strength of the reliability evidence based on their Pearson correlation coefficients (), and arrange the assessments in order from the one showing the STRONGEST evidence of reliability to the one showing the WEAKEST evidence of reliability.
Learn After
Replication Crisis in Science
Impact of Replication Outcomes on Scientific Findings
A research team publishes a novel study concluding that a specific 5-minute daily puzzle-solving activity dramatically enhances creative problem-solving skills in adults. The study receives significant media attention. From a scientific standpoint, what is the most important reason for an independent lab to perform a similar study?
A research team finds that a specific mindfulness exercise significantly improves focus in a sample of high school students. Before the scientific community accepts this as a robust finding, other independent researchers repeat the same study using new samples of participants. Which of the following best explains the primary scientific purpose of this process?
Match each psychology research scenario involving an attempt to repeat a study with the most appropriate scientific conclusion regarding the original finding.
Arrange the following research scenarios based on the degree to which they minimize the likelihood that a significant finding is a statistical artifact rather than a genuine phenomenon, from the least protection against error (1) to the most protection against error (3).
A researcher is making a scientifically sound judgment when they conclude that a single study with a statistically significant result () provides definitive evidence of a real-world effect, rendering further replication unnecessary.
A researcher publishes a study finding that students who listened to a 'nature sounds' recording for 10 minutes increased their scores on a creativity test (; ). You are tasked with constructing a multi-phase research program to determine if this finding is a genuine phenomenon or a statistical artifact. Which of the following plans represents the most scientifically robust synthesis of replication principles?
In psychological research, conducting a replication of a study involves repeating the experiment using the exact same sample of participants as the original study.
In psychological research, the practice of repeating another scientist's experiment, often with new samples, to assess whether the original findings are reliable is called _____.
Match each research scenario with the concept or scientific risk it demonstrates according to the principles of replication and statistical error.
If a researcher conducts an isolated study and finds a significant effect, but multiple subsequent replication attempts with new samples fail to produce the same outcome, the original finding was likely a _____ rather than a genuine, real-world phenomenon.
Order the following scientific scenarios based on the level of confidence a researcher should have that the finding represents a genuine, real-world phenomenon (from lowest confidence to highest confidence).