Learn Before
A researcher publishes a study showing that, on average, a new study app improves exam scores in a class of 100 students. A student counselor wants to recommend this app to an individual student struggling in class. Apply the critique of single-subject researchers to explain how this individual student's response might differ from the study's average result.
Question: A researcher publishes a study showing that, on average, a new study app improves exam scores in a class of 100 students. A student counselor wants to recommend this app to an individual student struggling in class. Apply the critique of single-subject researchers to explain how this individual student's response might differ from the study's average result.
Sample answer: The counselor cannot guarantee the app will help the struggling student because group averages do not ensure individual success. While the average exam score improved, this specific student could experience a highly positive improvement, a neutral outcome with no change, or a negative outcome where their scores actually decrease.
Key points:
- The group average improvement does not guarantee a positive result for the individual student.
- The individual student's outcome could be highly positive, neutral, or negative.
- This demonstrates the external validity limit of generalizing group data to individual clients.
Rubric: The response must apply the single-subject critique by explaining that the group average does not guarantee the individual student's outcome, and must explicitly list that the student's performance could be highly positive, negative, or neutral.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
According to single-subject researchers, what is a major limitation of applying the findings of large group studies to individuals?
A researcher conducts a large-group experiment and finds that, on average, participants who used a new study technique scored 15 points higher on a memory test than those who did not. The researcher concludes that every individual who uses this technique will experience a meaningful improvement in memory performance. This conclusion is justified because the group average demonstrates a clear effect.
A large-group study on a new cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) program for insomnia finds that, on average, participants fell asleep 20 minutes faster after treatment. Match each participant's hypothetical outcome to its correct interpretation based on the principle of individual generalization.
A psychologist is investigating why a statistically significant result from a large-group study might fail to predict the outcome for a specific individual. Arrange the steps in the logical order that demonstrates the breakdown of individual generalization in group research.
A research study reports that, on average, a group of 200 students improved their focus using a new meditation technique. Arrange the steps below in the logical order required to analyze why this group-level result might not reliably predict the outcome for one specific student.
According to single-subject researchers, what is a primary limitation of applying the results of large group studies to individuals?
A clinical researcher evaluates a study showing that, on average, a group of participants significantly improved their sleep quality using a new relaxation technique. The researcher concludes that this average effect is an insufficient basis for claiming the technique will work for every person because group-level research fails to account for ________, which can lead to specific individuals having a neutral or even negative response.
If a large-scale study finds that a new mindfulness technique significantly reduces cortisol levels (a physiological marker of stress) on average, this result guarantees that any specific individual practicing the technique will see a similar reduction in their cortisol levels.
A clinical study on a new insomnia treatment finds that, on average, the 100 participants fell asleep 25 minutes faster. However, individual results varied significantly. Match each hypothetical participant's outcome with the descriptive category that highlights the limitations of generalizing group averages to individuals.
A researcher concludes that because a group study found a significant average benefit (), the intervention is guaranteed to work for every individual. To correctly evaluate this claim, one must identify that the researcher is ignoring the impact of individual _____, which means some participants may actually experience negative or neutral outcomes despite the positive group average.
According to single-subject researchers, what is the primary external validity limitation of using large group studies to draw conclusions about individuals? In your response, describe the range of individual outcomes that a group-level average might obscure.
Explain why Dr. Martinez cannot assume that the cognitive intervention will reduce Sarah's test anxiety, and describe the possible outcomes Sarah might experience based on the arguments of single-subject researchers.
A researcher publishes a study showing that, on average, a new study app improves exam scores in a class of 100 students. A student counselor wants to recommend this app to an individual student struggling in class. Apply the critique of single-subject researchers to explain how this individual student's response might differ from the study's average result.