Short Answer

A researcher wants to study academic procrastination. If they choose to use an observational research design to observe students in a library, what type of conclusions are they restricted to making, and what must they avoid claiming about the relationship between library study habits and procrastination?

Question: A researcher wants to study academic procrastination. If they choose to use an observational research design to observe students in a library, what type of conclusions are they restricted to making, and what must they avoid claiming about the relationship between library study habits and procrastination?

Sample answer: The researcher is restricted to making descriptive conclusions that provide a snapshot of behaviors as they naturally occur in the library. They must avoid claiming a cause-and-effect relationship between study habits and procrastination, because they are not manipulating or controlling any variables.

Key points:

  • Restricted to descriptive conclusions or snapshots of naturally occurring behaviors.
  • Must avoid claiming cause-and-effect or causal relationships.
  • Applies the rule that lack of variable manipulation/control prevents causal inference.

Rubric: The student must state that the researcher is limited to descriptive snapshots/conclusions of naturally occurring behavior. The student must also specify that the researcher cannot make causal/cause-and-effect claims due to the lack of manipulation or control of variables.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-27

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related