Learn Before
A social psychologist conducts an ethical study on cooperation using college student participants. However, when writing the journal manuscript, the researcher fabricates a portion of the statistical results to make the effect seem stronger. Apply the ethical framework to identify which specific stakeholder group is directly violated by this fabrication, and explain how this action impacts that group.
Question: A social psychologist conducts an ethical study on cooperation using college student participants. However, when writing the journal manuscript, the researcher fabricates a portion of the statistical results to make the effect seem stronger. Apply the ethical framework to identify which specific stakeholder group is directly violated by this fabrication, and explain how this action impacts that group.
Sample answer: The fabrication directly violates ethical obligations to the scientific community. By publishing fake results, the researcher misleads other scientists who rely on these findings to guide their own research, wasting scientific resources and damaging the field's credibility.
Key points:
- Identifies the scientific community as the directly violated stakeholder group.
- Explains that the scientific community relies on the findings to build future research.
- Explains that fabricated data misleads other researchers and wastes resources.
Rubric: The student must identify the scientific community as the group whose ethical considerations are violated and explain that the violation occurs because this community relies on the integrity of the findings to build their own work.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Scientific Community
Society
Psychological Research Participant
Participants in Psychological Research
According to the ethical framework for evaluating a scientific research project, which three primary groups must be considered when assessing the study's impact?
Match each group affected by psychological research with the primary ethical concern a researcher must address for that stakeholder.
A researcher conducts a study on a new memory-enhancement technique and treats all student participants ethically. If the researcher later intentionally misrepresents the study's limitations in a report to the scientific community, they have committed an ethical violation even though the participants themselves were unharmed.
Evaluating the ethical scope of a research project involves identifying the scale of impact across various tiers of stakeholders. Arrange the three groups considered in a standard ethical framework in order of the breadth of the researcher's accountability, starting with the group requiring the most direct and localized oversight and ending with the group representing the most general and distal impact.
A psychologist is planning a high-stakes experimental study on the impact of sleep deprivation on high-pressure decision-making. To ensure the research design addresses all three primary groups affected by scientific research, which of the following synthesized protocols should the researcher implement?
A thorough ethical evaluation of a scientific research project is limited to assessing the impact on the individuals who participate in the study.
A researcher treats participants with respect and debriefs them properly, fulfilling all ethical obligations toward research participants. However, in the final manuscript, the researcher omits several 'outlier' data points solely because they weakened the statistical significance of the results. This selective misreporting primarily violates the researcher's ethical responsibilities to the _____.
To fully understand the ethical scope of a study, a researcher must evaluate how it affects the specific individuals being tested, the scientific community, and _____ as a whole.
A research group is reviewing an ethical checklist for a new clinical trial. Match each specific ethical concern or action with the primary stakeholder group it is designed to address, based on the three-group ethical framework.
An ethical review board is evaluating a researcher's proposal. To satisfy the ethical framework systematically, the researcher must plan and address ethical concerns in a logical progression from immediate study design to broad public dissemination. Order the following actions from the earliest stage (designing study procedures) to the latest stage (public impact).
According to the moral foundations of ethical research, a thorough ethical evaluation of a scientific research project must assess its impact across different stakeholders. Identify and briefly describe the three primary groups of stakeholders that are evaluated under this ethical framework.
Based on Dr. Miller's research plan, explain how her planned actions address the ethical obligations owed to each of the three primary stakeholder groups in scientific research.
A social psychologist conducts an ethical study on cooperation using college student participants. However, when writing the journal manuscript, the researcher fabricates a portion of the statistical results to make the effect seem stronger. Apply the ethical framework to identify which specific stakeholder group is directly violated by this fabrication, and explain how this action impacts that group.