An economist conducts an experiment to see if small-scale artisans in a town are limited by their ability to get funding for their businesses. The artisans are randomly divided into two groups. Group A receives a cash grant of $1,000. Group B receives no grant. After one year, the economist finds that artisans in Group A, on average, purchased 30% more raw materials and equipment and reported 25% higher business profits than artisans in Group B. What is the most logical conclusion to draw from these results?
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
CORE Econ
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.9 Lenders and borrowers and differences in wealth - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Analysis in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
Related
Nigerian Business Plan Competition Experiment on Credit Constraints
Sri Lankan Small Business Grant Experiment on Credit Constraints
An economist conducts an experiment to see if small-scale artisans in a town are limited by their ability to get funding for their businesses. The artisans are randomly divided into two groups. Group A receives a cash grant of $1,000. Group B receives no grant. After one year, the economist finds that artisans in Group A, on average, purchased 30% more raw materials and equipment and reported 25% higher business profits than artisans in Group B. What is the most logical conclusion to draw from these results?
Critique of a Credit Constraint Experiment
The Role of Randomization in Economic Experiments
Designing an Experiment to Identify Credit Constraints
In an experiment designed to test for credit constraints, observing that the group receiving a cash grant significantly increased their business investment is, by itself, sufficient evidence to conclude that these individuals were credit-constrained.
Interpreting Experimental Results on Credit Constraints
In an experiment designed to determine if entrepreneurs are held back by a lack of funding, researchers use several key components. Match each component with its specific role in establishing a causal link between receiving funds and business growth.
An economist wants to determine if a lack of access to funding is preventing farmers in a rural area from adopting a new, more productive type of seed. To do this, they design an experiment. Arrange the following steps in the logical order an economist would follow to conduct this experiment and reach a conclusion.
Interpreting Null Results in a Credit Constraint Experiment
In an experiment designed to test for credit constraints, researchers randomly give a cash grant to one group of entrepreneurs (the treatment group) but not to another (the control group). By comparing the business outcomes of the treatment group to the control group, the researchers can isolate the ____ effect of the grant, helping them determine if a lack of funds was the primary barrier to growth.