Nigerian Business Plan Competition Experiment on Credit Constraints
An experiment in Nigeria provides evidence of credit constraints among entrepreneurs. The government selected a group of high-quality business plans and randomly gave a cash grant of about $50,000 to some of them. The recipients used this money to expand their businesses by hiring more employees and buying more capital equipment, rather than lending it out. This decision indicates that they were previously credit-constrained, as the grant enabled them to pursue profitable expansions they couldn't finance before.
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
CORE Econ
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.9 Lenders and borrowers and differences in wealth - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Related
Nigerian Business Plan Competition Experiment on Credit Constraints
Sri Lankan Small Business Grant Experiment on Credit Constraints
An economist conducts an experiment to see if small-scale artisans in a town are limited by their ability to get funding for their businesses. The artisans are randomly divided into two groups. Group A receives a cash grant of $1,000. Group B receives no grant. After one year, the economist finds that artisans in Group A, on average, purchased 30% more raw materials and equipment and reported 25% higher business profits than artisans in Group B. What is the most logical conclusion to draw from these results?
Critique of a Credit Constraint Experiment
The Role of Randomization in Economic Experiments
Designing an Experiment to Identify Credit Constraints
In an experiment designed to test for credit constraints, observing that the group receiving a cash grant significantly increased their business investment is, by itself, sufficient evidence to conclude that these individuals were credit-constrained.
Interpreting Experimental Results on Credit Constraints
In an experiment designed to determine if entrepreneurs are held back by a lack of funding, researchers use several key components. Match each component with its specific role in establishing a causal link between receiving funds and business growth.
An economist wants to determine if a lack of access to funding is preventing farmers in a rural area from adopting a new, more productive type of seed. To do this, they design an experiment. Arrange the following steps in the logical order an economist would follow to conduct this experiment and reach a conclusion.
Interpreting Null Results in a Credit Constraint Experiment
In an experiment designed to test for credit constraints, researchers randomly give a cash grant to one group of entrepreneurs (the treatment group) but not to another (the control group). By comparing the business outcomes of the treatment group to the control group, the researchers can isolate the ____ effect of the grant, helping them determine if a lack of funds was the primary barrier to growth.
Learn After
A government program identifies a group of entrepreneurs with high-potential business plans. Half of these entrepreneurs are randomly selected to receive a large, unexpected cash grant. The recipients overwhelmingly use the funds to purchase new equipment and hire more employees for their businesses. What is the most logical conclusion to draw from the recipients' actions?
In an experiment, a group of entrepreneurs with pre-vetted, high-quality business plans were randomly given large cash grants. The recipients used the funds to expand their businesses. A critic suggests this outcome doesn't prove the entrepreneurs were previously unable to get loans; it just shows they were willing to spend 'free money' on their ventures. Which of the following provides the strongest counter-argument to this critic's position?
Interpreting Experimental Evidence on Credit Access
In an experiment where entrepreneurs with high-quality business plans were given large cash grants, if the recipients had chosen to lend the money out at the prevailing market interest rate instead of investing it in their own businesses, this outcome would still serve as strong evidence that they were previously credit-constrained.
Explaining Evidence of Credit Constraints
Imagine a government program identifies entrepreneurs with high-quality business plans and randomly gives a large cash grant to half of them. The goal is to test if these entrepreneurs are 'credit-constrained,' meaning they have profitable investment opportunities but cannot get loans. Which of the following hypothetical outcomes would most effectively CHALLENGE the conclusion that the entrepreneurs were credit-constrained?
Critiquing Experimental Evidence on Entrepreneurship
In an experiment studying credit access, entrepreneurs with high-quality business plans were randomly given large cash grants. Match each potential action taken by the grant recipients with its most likely economic interpretation.
Analyzing Experimental Results on Business Growth
The results of the Nigerian business plan experiment, where entrepreneurs who received cash grants expanded their businesses, imply that a policy of giving cash grants to any entrepreneur, regardless of their business plan's quality, would be an equally effective way to stimulate business growth.