Multiple Choice

An economist studies a historical period where new technology greatly increased factory output per worker. Despite this, factory wages remained low for several decades. During this time, a massive population shift from rural farming to urban factory work occurred. Two historians propose explanations:

  • Historian 1: "The primary driver of this migration was the creation of a vast number of new jobs as profitable companies expanded their operations."
  • Historian 2: "The migration only happened because of a simultaneous collapse in agricultural income, which pushed people off their farms to seek any alternative."

Based on the economic relationship between productivity, profits, and labor demand, which assessment of these explanations is most accurate?

0

1

Updated 2025-08-13

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

Economics

Social Science

Empirical Science

Science

Economy

CORE Econ

The Economy 1.0 @ CORE Econ

Ch.2 Technology, Population, and Growth - The Economy 1.0 @ CORE Econ

Introduction to Microeconomics Course

Ch.2 Technology and incentives - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ

Evaluation in Bloom's Taxonomy

The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ

Cognitive Psychology

Psychology

Related