Learn Before
Anchoring Inflationary Expectations via Credible Inflation Targeting
When a central bank consistently and successfully pursues its inflation target, it builds credibility. This credibility can lead to 'anchored' inflationary expectations, where households and firms come to believe that future inflation will remain stable at the central bank's target rate.
0
1
Tags
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Macroeconomics Course
Ch.5 Macroeconomic policy: Inflation and unemployment - The Economy 2.0 Macroeconomics @ CORE Econ
The Economy 2.0 Macroeconomics @ CORE Econ
CORE Econ
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Related
Anchoring Expectations through Consistent Inflation Targeting
A central bank, which operates under an inflation-targeting framework, has a stated goal of 2% annual inflation. Following an unexpected economic shock, inflation rises to 5%. The bank responds by increasing its policy interest rate. A year later, inflation has decreased to 3.5% but is still significantly above the 2% target. According to the principle that inflation targeting is a continuous and iterative process, what is the central bank obligated to do next?
Evaluating Central Bank Policy Actions
Consequences of Inconsistent Monetary Policy
Under an inflation-targeting framework, once a central bank successfully brings inflation back to its target after a deviation, its primary responsibility regarding the target is considered complete until the next major economic shock occurs.
The Nature of Inflation Targeting
A central bank operates under a framework where it is obligated to persistently take action to keep inflation at a specific target. Arrange the following events into the most logical chronological sequence to illustrate this continuous policy process in action.
Match each central bank policy scenario with the principle of the continuous inflation targeting process it best illustrates.
A country's central bank has an inflation target of 2%. For the past two years, inflation has been persistently high, starting at 8% and gradually falling to its current level of 4% after several policy adjustments. A public official claims, "The central bank's policy is clearly not working, as inflation is still double the target after two years. It's time to abandon this approach." From the perspective of a continuous inflation-targeting framework, which of the following statements provides the most accurate evaluation of the public official's claim?
Evaluating Central Bank Inaction
Responding to a Policy Misjudgment
Inflation's Convergence to Target under an Inflation Targeting Framework
Anchoring Inflationary Expectations via Credible Inflation Targeting
Learn After
The Impact of Anchored Expectations on Disinflation Costs
Central Bank Credibility and Inflation Expectations
Consider two countries, both with a stated inflation target of 2%. The central bank in Country A has a long and consistent track record of meeting this target, earning significant public trust. In contrast, the central bank in Country B has frequently missed its target, and its policy announcements are often viewed with skepticism. If both countries experience an identical, temporary external shock that pushes current inflation to 5%, how would the public's long-term wage and price-setting behavior most likely differ between the two countries?
The Credibility Gap: Actions vs. Announcements
True or False: If a central bank has established high credibility and successfully anchored the public's inflation expectations at 2%, a sudden, temporary increase in oil prices that pushes current inflation to 5% will likely cause long-term wage negotiations to immediately incorporate an expectation of 5% future inflation.
The Challenge of Building Credibility