Apply the design logic of Cacioppo and Petty's (1982) validation study to a new scenario. If a researcher wants to validate a new scale measuring 'enjoyment of physical labor' using a non-experimental correlational design, how should they select and compare their participant groups without creating an experiment?
Question: Apply the design logic of Cacioppo and Petty's (1982) validation study to a new scenario. If a researcher wants to validate a new scale measuring 'enjoyment of physical labor' using a non-experimental correlational design, how should they select and compare their participant groups without creating an experiment?
Sample answer: The researcher should select two pre-existing groups that naturally differ on the trait, such as construction workers (expected to score high) and office clerks (expected to score low). They would then administer the scale and compare the scores of these pre-existing groups without manipulating their occupations or assigning participants to the jobs.
Key points:
- Selects two logical, pre-existing groups expected to differ on the target construct.
- Proposes comparing the scale scores of these groups.
- Specifies that the researcher must not manipulate the groups or assign participants to them.
Rubric: To receive full credit, the answer must describe selecting two logical pre-existing groups expected to differ on the construct and comparing their scores without manipulating variables or assigning participants.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
In Cacioppo and Petty's (1982) correlational study, they validated the Need for Cognition Scale by comparing the scores of university professors with those of factory workers.
Cacioppo and Petty (1982) validated their 'Need for Cognition Scale' by comparing the scores of university professors with those of factory workers. Which of the following best explains why this study is categorized as a non-experimental, correlational design?
Cacioppo and Petty (1982) validated the Need for Cognition Scale by comparing university professors and factory workers. Match each component of their study to the methodological role it plays in this non-experimental design.
Analyze the methodological logic of the 'known-groups' validation strategy used by Cacioppo and Petty (1982). Arrange the following steps in the correct order to demonstrate how they used a non-experimental design to validate the scale.
In the 1982 study by John Cacioppo and Richard Petty, which two occupational groups were compared to validate the 'Need for Cognition' Scale?
Cacioppo and Petty's (1982) study is considered an experiment because the researchers compared the scores of two different groups.
When evaluating the methodological design of the Cacioppo and Petty (1982) study, a researcher would determine that the lack of _____ to the occupational groups is the primary reason the study is classified as non-experimental rather than experimental.
Cacioppo and Petty (1982) validated the Need for Cognition Scale using a non-experimental design. Match each methodological concept on the left to the specific way it is instantiated in their study.
When analyzing the internal structure of Cacioppo and Petty's (1982) study, a researcher would classify occupation (professor vs. factory worker) as a _____ variableāa pre-existing participant characteristic that sorts people into groups without any experimental manipulationāand would conclude that this feature is precisely why the design cannot support a causal claim about occupation's effect on need for cognition.
A research methods instructor asks students to critically evaluate the strength of construct validity evidence that Cacioppo and Petty's (1982) known-groups comparison provides for the Need for Cognition Scale. Arrange the following evaluative steps in the correct logical order.
Describe the 1982 study by John Cacioppo and Richard Petty that validated the Need for Cognition Scale. Specifically, identify the two participant groups they compared, the purpose of this comparison, and explain the methodological reason why this design is classified as non-experimental rather than experimental.
Based on the case context, diagnose the error in the student's understanding of research designs. Explain why comparing these two occupational groups does not make the study an experiment, and identify the key feature that makes it a non-experimental correlational study instead.
Apply the design logic of Cacioppo and Petty's (1982) validation study to a new scenario. If a researcher wants to validate a new scale measuring 'enjoyment of physical labor' using a non-experimental correlational design, how should they select and compare their participant groups without creating an experiment?