Based on the methodological characteristics of the intersection observation example, explain which parts of the researcher's conclusion are valid and which parts are invalid.
Case context: A researcher replicates the intersection observation study by standing at a busy road, observing and recording the gender of drivers and whether they are using a cell phone. After observing 500 drivers, the researcher finds a strong relationship showing that female drivers are significantly more likely to use cell phones than male drivers. In the discussion section of their paper, the researcher writes: 'Our study demonstrates that driver gender is a predictor of cell phone usage, and we conclude that driver gender causes differences in cell phone usage.'
Question: Based on the methodological characteristics of the intersection observation example, explain which parts of the researcher's conclusion are valid and which parts are invalid.
Sample answer: The researcher's conclusion that gender can be used to predict cell phone usage is valid because non-experimental research allows researchers to describe naturally occurring relationships and make predictions. However, the conclusion that driver gender causes differences in cell phone usage is invalid. Because the researcher only observed and measured variables as they naturally occurred without any experimental manipulation, they cannot establish a causal link.
Key points:
- Explains that predicting cell phone use based on gender is a valid conclusion.
- Explains that concluding gender causes cell phone use is an invalid conclusion.
- Demonstrates understanding that non-experimental research can describe and predict but not establish causality.
- Articulates that the lack of experimental manipulation is what prevents causal conclusions.
Rubric: The response must distinguish between the valid and invalid conclusions. It must explain that predicting behavior is valid because non-experimental designs describe naturally occurring relationships. It must also explain that claiming a causal link is invalid because the study did not involve experimental manipulation.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
In the example of non-experimental research involving the observation of a busy intersection, what conclusion are researchers UNABLE to draw about drivers' genders and cell phone usage?
In the intersection observation study, researchers can use their findings to make predictions about driver behavior even though they did not manipulate any variables.
A researcher conducts a study by observing a busy intersection to record drivers' genders and cell phone usage. Match each specific aspect of this intersection study to the research concept it illustrates.
A researcher conducts an intersection observation and finds that women use cell phones more frequently than men while driving. Arrange the logical steps to analyze why this study's design fails to establish a causal link between gender and phone usage.
You are constructing a new study to investigate the relationship between the type of beverage students purchase and whether they study alone or in groups. Arrange the following steps to design a research protocol that mirrors the logic of the intersection observation study.
Based on the intersection observation example, match each research concept to its correct description.
A researcher reviews the data from the intersection observation study and concludes, 'This evidence demonstrates that driver gender is the reason for differences in cell phone usage frequency.' In evaluating the scientific validity of this conclusion, a critic would argue that the claim is unjustified because the study's non-experimental design lacks _____.
A psychology student observes a campus coffee shop, recording whether customers are wearing earbuds and whether they are working alone or in groups. No variables are manipulated. A classmate reviews the data and concludes: "This study proves that wearing earbuds causes students to prefer working alone." How should the student respond to this interpretation?
A critic argues that the intersection cell phone observation study would become an experiment—and therefore allow causal conclusions—if the researcher simply increased the sample size by observing drivers at dozens of additional intersections.
A public health agency asks a researcher to use the intersection observation data—showing gender differences in cell phone use while driving—to justify a new causal policy argument. A methodologist reviewing this proposal should caution that the intersection study can only demonstrate a _____ between gender and cell phone use, and therefore cannot by itself provide a causal rationale for policy, because no variable was experimentally manipulated in the study.
Based on the intersection observation example of non-experimental research, identify the two goals of science that this study can fulfill, and recall the primary scientific limitation of this research design regarding the relationship between the measured variables.
Based on the methodological characteristics of the intersection observation example, explain which parts of the researcher's conclusion are valid and which parts are invalid.
Imagine you want to design a new observational study to investigate the relationship between a student's seating location (front row vs. back row) and whether they use a laptop during a lecture. Applying the principles of the intersection observation example, identify the two variables you would measure and describe the limitation on the type of conclusion you could draw from this study.