Learn Before
Based on the provided context, explain why Dr. Sterling cannot automatically assume that this chapter has undergone the same level of rigorous quality control as a standard peer-reviewed journal article. What should Dr. Sterling check or understand about the chapter's editorial history?
Case context: Dr. Sterling is a psychologist writing a literature review on cognitive development. She finds a chapter in an edited book written by a prominent researcher in the field. The chapter presents new experimental findings. The book's introduction mentions that the editor invited contributors who are experts in cognitive psychology.
Question: Based on the provided context, explain why Dr. Sterling cannot automatically assume that this chapter has undergone the same level of rigorous quality control as a standard peer-reviewed journal article. What should Dr. Sterling check or understand about the chapter's editorial history?
Sample answer: Dr. Sterling cannot assume the chapter has been peer-reviewed because editors of edited books sometimes directly invite scientists to contribute chapters without a formal, rigorous peer-review process. Unlike peer-reviewed journals where review is mandatory, edited book chapters do not guarantee peer review. Dr. Sterling should check if the editor subjected the invited chapter to an independent, formal peer-review process rather than relying solely on the editor's invitation.
Key points:
- Distinguish between guaranteed peer-review in journals versus non-guaranteed peer-review in edited book chapters.
- Explain that editors often invite scientists to contribute directly, which can bypass formal peer review.
- Recognize that Dr. Sterling must evaluate if a rigorous review process was actually applied by the editor.
- Demonstrate comprehension of the potential lack of independent quality-control for invited book chapters.
Rubric: The response must demonstrate an understanding that edited book chapters do not guarantee peer review. It should explain that editors may directly invite scientists to contribute without formal review, meaning the quality-control process differs from standard peer-reviewed journals. The learner must justify why Dr. Sterling needs to look into whether peer review actually occurred.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Which of the following accurately describes the review process for chapters contributed to edited academic books?
Match each term related to reporting research in an academic book chapter with its corresponding description.
A researcher receives an invitation from an editor to contribute a chapter on developmental psychology to a new edited academic book. Based on the standards for this reporting method, the researcher can correctly assume that their chapter will be subject to a guaranteed and formal peer-review process.
A psychology student is evaluating the scientific rigor of a research finding published in an academic book chapter. Arrange the following steps in the logical order required to analyze the quality-control process of this specific source, from the initial categorization to the final evaluation of its credibility.
A formal peer-review process is guaranteed for all chapters published in edited academic books.
When considering how researchers report their findings, what is a key distinction regarding the editorial process of an academic book chapter?
A student is evaluating sources for a research paper on stress and coping. Match each editorial scenario to the correct conclusion about the peer-review status of the resulting edited book chapter.
When analyzing why an edited book chapter may carry less evidential weight than a peer-reviewed journal article, the critical structural difference is that the decision to require formal peer review rests entirely with the _____, who may instead choose to fill the volume by directly inviting contributors without any external evaluation.
A student finds a chapter in an edited academic book and must judge whether it is credible enough to cite as evidence in a psychology research paper. Arrange the following steps in the most logical order for making that evaluative judgment.
When critically appraising the scientific rigor of an academic book chapter, a researcher must recognize that the presence of a formal peer-review process is _____, as editors may bypass this requirement through direct invitations.
Describe the editorial and review processes associated with publishing a chapter in an edited academic book, as an alternative method for reporting scientific findings. Specifically, explain the role of the editor and whether peer review is guaranteed.
Based on the provided context, explain why Dr. Sterling cannot automatically assume that this chapter has undergone the same level of rigorous quality control as a standard peer-reviewed journal article. What should Dr. Sterling check or understand about the chapter's editorial history?
A research assistant wants to cite a chapter from an edited psychology book to support their study's methodology. Apply your knowledge of academic book chapter publishing to advise the assistant on what caution they must exercise before assuming the chapter's content has been formally peer-reviewed, and what they should verify.