Learn Before
Describe the editorial and review processes associated with publishing a chapter in an edited academic book, as an alternative method for reporting scientific findings. Specifically, explain the role of the editor and whether peer review is guaranteed.
Question: Describe the editorial and review processes associated with publishing a chapter in an edited academic book, as an alternative method for reporting scientific findings. Specifically, explain the role of the editor and whether peer review is guaranteed.
Sample answer: Writing a chapter for an edited book is an alternative method for researchers to report their findings. In this process, the book's editor is responsible for reviewing the chapter. Although it is ideal for the editor to subject the chapter to a rigorous peer-review process, this peer review is not guaranteed. Editors sometimes directly invite scientists to contribute chapters, bypassing the formal peer-review process entirely.
Key points:
- Identify writing a chapter for an edited book as an alternative reporting method.
- Explain that the editor determines the level of review for the chapter.
- State that a rigorous peer-review process is ideal but not guaranteed.
- Describe how editors can directly invite scientists to contribute chapters without a formal review process.
Rubric: To receive full credit, the response must correctly identify edited book chapters as an alternative reporting method, explain that the editor decides on peer review, and state that peer review is not guaranteed because editors may directly invite scientists to contribute without formal review.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Which of the following accurately describes the review process for chapters contributed to edited academic books?
Match each term related to reporting research in an academic book chapter with its corresponding description.
A researcher receives an invitation from an editor to contribute a chapter on developmental psychology to a new edited academic book. Based on the standards for this reporting method, the researcher can correctly assume that their chapter will be subject to a guaranteed and formal peer-review process.
A psychology student is evaluating the scientific rigor of a research finding published in an academic book chapter. Arrange the following steps in the logical order required to analyze the quality-control process of this specific source, from the initial categorization to the final evaluation of its credibility.
A formal peer-review process is guaranteed for all chapters published in edited academic books.
When considering how researchers report their findings, what is a key distinction regarding the editorial process of an academic book chapter?
A student is evaluating sources for a research paper on stress and coping. Match each editorial scenario to the correct conclusion about the peer-review status of the resulting edited book chapter.
When analyzing why an edited book chapter may carry less evidential weight than a peer-reviewed journal article, the critical structural difference is that the decision to require formal peer review rests entirely with the _____, who may instead choose to fill the volume by directly inviting contributors without any external evaluation.
A student finds a chapter in an edited academic book and must judge whether it is credible enough to cite as evidence in a psychology research paper. Arrange the following steps in the most logical order for making that evaluative judgment.
When critically appraising the scientific rigor of an academic book chapter, a researcher must recognize that the presence of a formal peer-review process is _____, as editors may bypass this requirement through direct invitations.
Describe the editorial and review processes associated with publishing a chapter in an edited academic book, as an alternative method for reporting scientific findings. Specifically, explain the role of the editor and whether peer review is guaranteed.
Based on the provided context, explain why Dr. Sterling cannot automatically assume that this chapter has undergone the same level of rigorous quality control as a standard peer-reviewed journal article. What should Dr. Sterling check or understand about the chapter's editorial history?
A research assistant wants to cite a chapter from an edited psychology book to support their study's methodology. Apply your knowledge of academic book chapter publishing to advise the assistant on what caution they must exercise before assuming the chapter's content has been formally peer-reviewed, and what they should verify.