Case Study

Based on the provided context, explain why the variation in the research assistants' responses poses a methodological problem for the study. Then, explain how the researchers can apply the strategy of anticipating participant questions to resolve this issue, detailing the two methods of implementation and the ultimate goal of doing so.

Case context: A research team is preparing to launch a laboratory study investigating the effects of stress on memory retrieval. During a pilot run, the team notices that some participants ask, "Should I prioritize speed or accuracy?" and different research assistants give different responses. One assistant says "both," another says "accuracy," and a third says "just do your best."

Question: Based on the provided context, explain why the variation in the research assistants' responses poses a methodological problem for the study. Then, explain how the researchers can apply the strategy of anticipating participant questions to resolve this issue, detailing the two methods of implementation and the ultimate goal of doing so.

Sample answer: The variation in research assistants' responses poses a methodological problem because it introduces unintended variation in how experimenters interact with different participants, which can compromise the standardization of the procedure. To resolve this using the strategy of anticipating participant questions, the researchers can: 1) Add a sentence directly to the standardized instructions explaining how participants should balance speed and accuracy, or 2) create a pre-scripted, standardized answer that all assistants must read word-for-word if asked about speed vs. accuracy. The ultimate goal is to standardize the experimental procedure and prevent unintended interaction variation.

Key points:

  • Explain that different assistant responses create unintended variation in experimenter-participant interactions, violating standardization.
  • Describe how to address the speed vs. accuracy question directly within the standardized instructions.
  • Describe how to develop a pre-scripted standard answer for the assistants to use if the question is asked.
  • State that the goal of these adjustments is to prevent unintended variation and standardize the procedure.

Rubric: The response must explain that the assistants' varied responses introduce unintended variation in experimenter-participant interactions. It must describe the two solutions: integrating the answer into the standardized instructions or developing pre-scripted answers. Finally, it must state that the goal is to standardize the procedure and eliminate interaction variation.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-26

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related