Baumrind's Criticism of Milgram's Study
Diana Baumrind criticized Stanley Milgram's obedience research for its lack of ethical follow-through. She argued that while Milgram could not have known in advance that participants would experience such severe negative reactions, he observed their distress after testing the first few subjects. According to Baumrind, Milgram should have monitored these unanticipated reactions and ethically adjusted his research procedures at that point.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Example: Baumrind's Criticism of Milgram's Study
Baumrind's Criticism of Milgram's Study
What action must investigators be prepared to take if participants exhibit unexpected distress or negative responses during an ongoing research study?
Arrange the following steps in the correct order for a researcher to ethically manage unanticipated participant reactions during an ongoing psychological study.
A researcher is conducting a study on the relationship between social media use and mood. Match each unanticipated participant reaction observed during the study with the most appropriate ethical action required by the principle of monitoring and safety.
In a psychological study where participants exhibit negative reactions that were not anticipated in the planning phase, the ethical principle of monitoring requires the researcher to prioritize the evaluation of procedural adjustments over the continued adherence to the original research protocol.
Match each term related to participant safety with its correct definition based on ethical standards for psychological research.
Which of the following best explains why researchers must continuously monitor participants for unanticipated negative reactions during an active psychology study, even if the research protocol was already ethically approved?
When evaluating the ethical integrity of an ongoing experiment, a researcher's decision to strictly adhere to the original protocol despite unanticipated participant distress is judged deficient because investigators are required to _____ the study's procedures to protect participant safety.
A cognitive psychologist conducting a memory study notices that several participants become highly frustrated and tearful when they cannot recall words. Because this specific distress was not anticipated in the approved study protocol, the investigator is ethically required to continue the study without making any changes to the procedures until all scheduled participants have completed the session.
When participants exhibit unexpected distress during an ongoing research study, investigators must analyze the situation by seeking participant feedback during the _____, which helps them determine how to adjust procedures for safety and ethical compliance.
Evaluate the ethical management of unanticipated participant reactions in an ongoing study by ordering the following steps from the initial monitoring phase to the final corrective action.
Learn After
According to Diana Baumrind's criticism of Stanley Milgram's obedience research, what was Milgram's primary ethical failure?
True or False: Diana Baumrind’s ethical critique of Stanley Milgram’s study was based on the argument that he should have modified his research procedures once he observed the unanticipated distress of his early participants.
A researcher is conducting a study on social influence. Based on Diana Baumrind's ethical critique of the Milgram obedience study, in what order should the researcher proceed after noticing unanticipated distress in the first few participants?
Diana Baumrind's critique of Stanley Milgram's study distinguishes between what a researcher can know beforehand and how they must respond to new information. Match each component of her argument to its specific role in her ethical evaluation of the obedience research.
In her ethical critique of the obedience research, what did Diana Baumrind acknowledge regarding Stanley Milgram's knowledge prior to the study?
Diana Baumrind's ethical critique of Stanley Milgram's obedience study distinguishes between initial ignorance and subsequent responsibility. Arrange the following stages of Milgram's research to reflect the logical progression of her argument.
Evaluating Milgram's obedience study through Baumrind's lens, his conduct shifted from 'unforeseeable' to 'unethical' specifically because he failed to _____ his procedures after witnessing the severe distress of his first few participants.
A graduate student is running a conformity experiment. After the first five participants show signs of acute psychological distress that was not predicted in the original protocol, she consults her faculty advisor but proceeds without making any changes to the study procedures. Based on Baumrind's principle as illustrated by the Milgram case, this decision is ethically defensible because the distress was unanticipated at the outset.
Using Baumrind's ethical framework as applied to Milgram's obedience research, match each research scenario to the moral evaluation she would assign it.
Baumrind's critique implies that a researcher who witnesses unanticipated participant distress and fails to act on that evidence bears _____ moral responsibility for subsequent harm than a researcher whose participants experienced equivalent distress before any evidence of it was available.
According to Diana Baumrind's critique of Stanley Milgram's obedience research, what was Milgram's primary ethical failure once the study was underway, and what did she acknowledge about his knowledge before the study began?
Based on Diana Baumrind's critique of Stanley Milgram's obedience study, explain how the researcher's justification in this case scenario misinterprets their ethical responsibilities during active research.
Suppose you are running an experiment on cognitive fatigue, and your first three participants experience severe, unanticipated anxiety attacks during the task. Applying Diana Baumrind's ethical critique of Milgram's study, what immediate action should you take regarding your research procedures?