Learn Before
Blind Administration
Blind administration is a procedural precaution used to minimize the experimenter expectancy effect by having a measure administered by a research helper who is completely unaware of the study's intent or the specific hypothesis being tested. This strategy effectively prevents the researcher's own expectations from inadvertently biasing participant behavior.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Blinding in Experiments
Rosenthal and Fode's Rat Maze Experiment
Blind Administration
Standardizing Interactions
Which of the following best describes the experimenter expectancy effect?
The experimenter expectancy effect can only occur when a researcher intentionally changes the study procedures to favor a desired outcome.
A researcher is testing whether listening to upbeat music increases social extroversion. Sequence the following events to illustrate how the experimenter expectancy effect could manifest in this scenario.
A researcher is conducting a study to determine if a new herbal supplement improves memory performance. Match each of the researcher's specific expectations with the subtle, unintended behavior that would most likely demonstrate the experimenter expectancy effect in this scenario.
You are designing a research protocol to test if listening to 'instrumental' music for minutes increases creativity. To create a systematic safeguard that ensures your own belief in the music's benefits does not inadvertently bias the participants' responses, which of the following integrated designs should you implement?
Match each research concept with the definition that correctly describes its role in potentially biasing the results of a psychological study.
Arrange the stages of the experimenter expectancy effect in the order they occur to illustrate how a researcher's beliefs can systematically bias a study's results.
In a formal peer review, a psychologist evaluates a study on 'memory and mood' and finds that the experimenter's knowledge of the hypothesis led to unintentional, encouraging nods toward participants in the 'happy mood' condition. The reviewer judges the study's data to be flawed because the methodology failed to account for the _____.
An investigator measuring memory retention inadvertently provides clearer instructions to the experimental group because they expect this group to perform better, which subsequently improves their test scores. True or False: This scenario represents an experimenter expectancy effect because the researcher's expectations subtly and unintentionally biased the participants' behavior, thereby compromising the study's validity.
A psychologist is evaluating a research design where the primary investigator—who is fully aware of the study's hypothesis—personally administers a psychological measure to participants. The psychologist critiques this setup as being highly vulnerable to the experimenter expectancy effect. To safeguard the study's validity, the psychologist recommends implementing a _____ administration, wherein the person collecting the data is kept unaware of the participants' assigned conditions.
Define the experimenter expectancy effect. In your definition, recall how a researcher's beliefs can subtly influence a study during the administration of a measure and state the consequence of this influence.
Based on this scenario, explain how the psychologist's expectations manifested as the experimenter expectancy effect. How does this impact the interpretation of the test scores and the overall validity of the study?
A researcher studying a new reading program expects it to improve reading speed. When administering the reading speed test, the researcher unintentionally gives the experimental group slightly more time to complete the task. Briefly apply the concept of the experimenter expectancy effect to explain why this action occurs and how it affects the study's validity.
Which of the following best describes the experimenter expectancy effect?
If a researcher unintentionally nods more frequently when interviewing participants who receive a new cognitive therapy compared to those in a control group, causing the therapy group to give more detailed answers, this demonstrates the experimenter expectancy effect.
Arrange the following events in chronological order to illustrate how the experimenter expectancy effect occurs during a psychological study.
Analyze the following scenarios demonstrating the experimenter expectancy effect. Match each subtle researcher behavior (the cause) to the most likely altered participant response (the effect).
A peer review committee is evaluating whether to publish a study on a new cognitive training program. You notice in the video recordings that the researcher, who strongly believed the program would work, unintentionally nodded and smiled more when assessing the treatment group compared to the control group. You vote to reject the manuscript because the study's validity is compromised by the ____.
What is a primary consequence of the experimenter expectancy effect during the administration of a psychological measure?
For the experimenter expectancy effect to occur, a researcher must deliberately and consciously guide participants to behave in ways that support the study's hypothesis.
Dr. Lee is investigating a new cognitive training exercise. She strongly believes the exercise will improve memory. During the memory test administration, she unintentionally leans forward and maintains more eye contact with the treatment group. Participants sense her engagement, become more motivated, and score higher. As a result, it is impossible to tell if the training itself actually worked. Match each core component of the experimenter expectancy effect to the specific event from this scenario.
An external review of an intervention study breaks down the procedural logs and finds that the primary investigator, aware of who was receiving the new drug, unconsciously offered more encouraging verbal prompts to the treatment group during the side-effect interviews. By isolating this inadvertent bias as the cause of systematic differences in participant reactivity, the reviewers determined the study's validity was compromised by the ____.
You are evaluating a completed research study to determine if the experimenter expectancy effect has compromised its validity. Arrange the analytical steps in the logical order you must follow to establish this methodological flaw.
Learn After
In blind administration, who is kept unaware of the study's hypothesis?
In blind administration, the primary objective is to keep the participants unaware of the hypothesis, while the research helper is fully informed of the expected results.
A researcher is conducting an experiment to determine if participants who listen to upbeat music while exercising have a higher heart rate than those who listen to calm music. Arrange the following steps in the correct order to implement a blind administration protocol for this study.
A researcher is investigating whether a specific scent improves concentration. To implement 'blind administration', they must carefully structure the roles and information flow. Match each component of this research design to its functional role in minimizing experimenter expectancy bias.
Blind administration is a procedural precaution specifically designed to minimize which of the following?
Which of the following scenarios best illustrates the underlying logic of using blind administration in a psychological experiment?
During a peer review, a researcher critiques a study for having the principal investigator—who holds strong expectations about the results—collect all participant data. To resolve this methodological concern and enhance the study's internal validity, the reviewer should recommend the use of _____ administration.
A psychology lab is testing whether a new breathing exercise reduces public speaking anxiety. The lead researcher, who strongly believes the exercise will be effective, administers the anxiety rating scale to all participants after they complete the exercise. The researcher records every response with care and neutrality. This procedure successfully achieves blind administration because the data were collected objectively.
A research team studies whether a memory technique improves recall. Analyze each feature of their protocol and match it to its methodological role in blind administration.
A published study reports that participants who received a new cognitive training program showed significant memory improvements. A peer reviewer notes that the same researcher who designed the program and strongly expected it to succeed also administered all memory assessments. The reviewer concludes that without employing _____, the reported improvements may reflect the researcher's unintentional influence on participants rather than a genuine effect of the training.
Define blind administration and explain its primary purpose in psychological research. Specifically, identify who is kept unaware of the study's details and what specific threat to internal validity this procedure is designed to minimize.
Identify the element of this study that represents blind administration and explain why this setup successfully minimizes the experimenter expectancy effect.
A clinical psychologist is conducting a study to see if a new mindfulness app reduces stress. The psychologist has designed the app and strongly believes it will work, and plans to administer the stress surveys to participants face-to-face. How should the psychologist modify this procedure to implement blind administration?