Learn Before
Cognitive Overload in Assessing the Novelty of New COVID-19 Studies
The vast amount of rapidly released information and research papers during the COVID-19 pandemic imposes a cognitive overload on researchers. This abundance of literature makes it very difficult to figure out the novelty of a new study.
0
1
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences
Related
Difficult to efficiently inform the research community about inappropriate results/findings
Repetition and contradiction in collaborative research
Published papers are static and don't get updated dynamically
Difficulties of multidisciplinary research collaboration
Time-consuming to self-judge many rapidly released papers
Marketing and subscription fees of journals
Personal ambitions and carrier incentives
Flaws in the published journal papers
Difficulty Informing the Public
Challenges with current research tools
References for Barriers to COVID-19 Research
Repetitions and contradictions topic sprint findings
Finding a Consensus (problems in interdisciplinary work) topic sprint findings
Scientists are drowning in COVID-19 papers (cognitive overload) topic sprint findings
tweets about literature or literature (Science COVID Info)
communicating with public and politicians (Science COVID Info)
tools and methods that are helping (Science COVID Info)
Difficulty Communicating Scientific Criticisms
Increased Role of Preprint Servers in COVID-19 Research
Cognitive Overload in Assessing the Novelty of New COVID-19 Studies