1Cademy - Community-Based Fact-Checking on Twitters Birdwatch Platform

Concept

Community-Based Fact-Checking on Twitter's Birdwatch Platform - Results

A lot more notes for misleading than non-misleading notes, primarily due to factual mistakes or unclear contexts (RQ 1)
Negative sentiments and longer explanations typically associated with misleading tweets (RQ 2)
A lot more discussion on Birdwatch regarding tweets made by politicians (RQ 3)
Misleading tweets receive more votes and attention on Birdwatch, and users find such interventions helpful if the overall sentiment is positive and supplementary sources are provided (RQ 4)
Tweets by users with more followers usually have more votes but are more likely to be regarded as misleading (RQ 5)

Updated 2021-06-10

Contributors are:

Who are from:

References