- These techniques are quick and limited. The methods trade rigor for rich responses.
- They result in qualitative rather than quantitative data, so we cannot look for statistical significance in the results of these tools
- The results cannot be generalized. These techniques are not designed for making broad statements about all potential users of the product.


University of Virginia, Charlottesville

- The Faces Questionnaire: Show participants 6 photos of various ambiguous facial expressions and have them rate how much they experienced the emotion expressed in the image while using the product
- Product-Reaction Cards: Participants select all reaction words that best describe their experience using the product from a 120 word, balanced list, then are challenged to narrow their choices to the top 5 most relevant words 

The Two Methods in the Microsoft Desirability Toolkit

https://elearn.uni-sofia.bg/pluginfile.php/55103/mod_resource/content/0/Resources/Systems_Evaluation/DesirabilityToolkit.doc

Measuring Desirability:  New methods for evaluating desirability in a usability lab setting

Example of the Faces Questionnaire

Example of Product Reaction Cards

The Microsoft Desirability Toolkit offers several advantages for user experience research. The methodology highly engages participants, encouraging them to openly share negative feedback, and it generally elicits more positive participant reactions than traditional questionnaires. Furthermore, usability practitioners can efficiently collect actionable data in just 5 to 10 minutes, recording it directly into a presentation-ready format for product teams. Finally, team members observing the toolkit exercises gain a more comprehensive understanding of user responses to the product.

Learn Before

Related