Consider an economic interaction where an initial set of rules results in an outcome that is inefficient; that is, a different outcome exists where at least one person could be made better off without making anyone worse off. If a change in the rules (e.g., new legislation or a new contract) leads to a new, efficient outcome, what fundamental economic principle does this situation illustrate?
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Economy
Economics
CORE Econ
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Ch.5 The rules of the game: Who gets what and why - The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Analysis in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
Related
Evaluating Efficiency and Fairness in an Economic Interaction
Analyzing Efficiency and Fairness under Different Rules
Consider an economic interaction where an initial set of rules results in an outcome that is inefficient; that is, a different outcome exists where at least one person could be made better off without making anyone worse off. If a change in the rules (e.g., new legislation or a new contract) leads to a new, efficient outcome, what fundamental economic principle does this situation illustrate?
In any economic interaction, an outcome that is judged to be fair by societal standards is, by definition, also economically efficient.
Reconciling Efficiency and Unfairness
Match each described economic outcome with the correct classification based on the principles of efficiency and fairness.
Policy Impact on Efficiency and Fairness
Consider an economic policy that changes the allocation of resources between two individuals. The new allocation is such that it is impossible to make one person better off without making the other person worse off. However, this new allocation also results in one individual having a vastly larger share of the resources than the other. Which statement best analyzes this outcome?
Designing Institutions for Efficiency and Fairness
In an economic interaction, if the initial allocation of resources is inefficient, any policy change designed to make the outcome fairer will necessarily result in a trade-off, reducing the overall efficiency of the allocation.