Learn Before
COVID-19 researchers need to be able to access COVID articles and their cited articles in order to conduct a more comprehensive review of the literature.
0
1
Contributors are:
Who are from:
Tags
CSCW (Computer-supported cooperative work)
Computing Sciences
Related
COVID-19 researches need to be able to easily find relevant and important papers among the mass influx of COVID papers in order to acquire more knowledge and advance their research.
COVID-19 researchers need claims to be scrutinized by qualified experts in order to spend less time and energy correcting misinformation or misleading information.
COVID-19 researchers need to be able to access COVID articles and their cited articles in order to conduct a more comprehensive review of the literature.
COVID-19 researchers need peer evaluation of research to acknowledge the gaps in our understanding of COVID-19 in order to promote more open research discourse and avoid discourse that prematurely tries to assess the validity of claims.
Learn After
Kareem Carr tweets about scientists communication mistakes
Egon Willighagen tweets that Springer Nature claims to allow researchers have free access to all of its COVID papers but does not allow researchers to read the cited papers of these articles
Austin Wright expresses that researchers should expand their sources from where they are getting information
Wikipedia: Restrictions against preprints and what adds credibility to a source
Wikipedia: Are hashtags a valid way for pinpointing important information?