Critique of the Composite Governance Index Methodology
A common method for creating a single governance quality score for a country involves averaging its rankings across six different indicators and then converting this average into a percentile relative to other countries. Critically evaluate this methodology. In your response, identify and explain one significant strength and one significant weakness of this approach for making cross-country comparisons.
0
1
Tags
Economics
Economy
Introduction to Macroeconomics Course
Ch.7 Macroeconomic policy in the global economy - The Economy 2.0 Macroeconomics @ CORE Econ
The Economy 2.0 Macroeconomics @ CORE Econ
CORE Econ
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
Evaluation in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
Related
Figure 7.23: Scatterplot of Governance Quality vs. Average Inflation (2012-2022)
A country's performance is assessed using six different indicators of institutional quality, which are typically closely related. For a particular country, the rankings on these six indicators are: 25, 30, 28, 95, 22, and 31. If a single summary score is created by calculating the simple average of these rankings, which statement best analyzes a potential problem with this approach for this specific country's data?
Applying the Composite Governance Index Methodology
To create a single, simplified measure of governance quality from multiple criteria for a large sample of countries, a specific methodology is used. Arrange the following steps of this process in the correct order.
Critique of the Composite Governance Index Methodology
In a study assessing governance quality across 167 nations, a composite index is created. First, an average score is calculated for each nation from six different indicators. Then, these average scores are converted into a percentile rank from 0 to 100. Suppose Nation X has an average score of 25 and Nation Y has an average score of 50 (where a lower score signifies better governance). This means Nation X's final percentile rank will necessarily be half of Nation Y's percentile rank.
Rationale for Percentile Ranking in a Composite Index
A methodology is used to create a single governance quality score for a large sample of countries from six different indicators. Match each component of this methodology to its correct description.
In a methodology designed to create a single governance quality score for 167 countries, an average is calculated from six different rankings for each country. To transform these average scores into a final, standardized ranking on a scale from 0 to 100, each country's average score is converted into a ____.
A methodology is used to create a composite index of governance quality for a large sample of countries. For each country, an average score is calculated from six indicators; a lower average score signifies better governance. These average scores are then converted into a percentile rank from 0 to 100, where a higher percentile rank represents better governance. Given this, if Country A has a percentile rank of 90 and Country B has a percentile rank of 45, which of the following is the most accurate conclusion?
Interpreting Composite Governance Index Results