Learn Before
Describe the workflow of a double-blind peer review process as used by most professional journals. In your answer, identify the roles of the researchers, the editor, and the expert reviewers, and state whose identities are concealed.
Question: Describe the workflow of a double-blind peer review process as used by most professional journals. In your answer, identify the roles of the researchers, the editor, and the expert reviewers, and state whose identities are concealed.
Sample answer: In a double-blind peer review, researchers submit their manuscript to a journal editor. The editor then forwards the manuscript to expert reviewers. The system is 'double-blind' because the identities of both the researchers and the reviewers are kept strictly concealed from one another. The reviewers read the manuscript, provide critical feedback, and give publication recommendations to the editor, who then uses this input to make a final decision to accept, reject, or request revisions.
Key points:
- Researchers submit their manuscript to the editor.
- The editor forwards the manuscript to expert reviewers.
- The identities of both the researchers and the reviewers are kept strictly concealed from each other.
- Reviewers provide critical feedback and publication recommendations.
- The editor uses the recommendations to accept, reject, or request revisions.
Rubric: To receive full credit, the student must: 1. Identify the three roles: researchers, editor, and expert reviewers. 2. Explain that the editor acts as the intermediary who forwards the manuscript and makes the final decision. 3. Clearly state that the double-blind aspect means both the researchers' and reviewers' identities are concealed from each other.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Open Peer Review
A researcher is concerned that their lack of professional fame might make it difficult to get their study published in a prestigious psychology journal. If the journal uses a double-blind peer review process, how does this system address the researcher's concern?
A psychology professor has just completed a study on childhood development and is submitting it to a journal that utilizes a double-blind peer review system. Arrange the following events in the correct chronological order to ensure the process remains anonymous for all parties involved.
In the double-blind peer review system used by psychology journals, different procedural safeguards serve distinct functions. Match each component of the process with the specific analytical bias or systemic problem it is designed to mitigate during the evaluation of a manuscript.
The double-blind peer review system is intended to ensure that research meets field standards; however, because the editor must ultimately interpret reviewer recommendations to make a final decision, the system cannot be correctly described as a 'purely objective' filter for scientific publication.
Suppose you are tasked with designing the procedural workflow for a new psychology journal that aims to implement a double-blind peer review system. To ensure the 'double-blind' criteria are structurally integrated into the platform, which of the following system designs should you implement?
In a double-blind peer review process, only the identities of the expert reviewers are concealed, while the reviewers are told the identities of the researchers.
In _____ peer review, the identities of both the manuscript authors and the reviewers are concealed from one another to help ensure unbiased evaluation before publication.
The following scenarios each illustrate a specific action or moment within a double-blind peer review process at a psychology journal. Match each scenario to the component of double-blind peer review it most directly exemplifies.
A research team compares two psychology journals: Journal A uses full double-blind peer review (both author and reviewer identities are concealed from one another), while Journal B conceals reviewer identities from authors but allows reviewers to see author names and institutional affiliations before evaluating manuscripts. The team finds that Journal B accepts manuscripts from high-prestige institutions at significantly higher rates than Journal A, despite comparable manuscript quality. Breaking down the structural difference between the two journals, the specific feature of double-blind peer review present in Journal A but absent from Journal B—namely, the practice of _____—most directly accounts for the disparity in acceptance rates.
A journal editor has just received all reviewer evaluations for a submitted manuscript and must complete the remaining steps of the double-blind peer review process. Evaluate the logical and ethical dependencies among the following steps, then arrange them in the order the editor should carry them out to make a well-informed, integrity-preserving publication decision.
Describe the workflow of a double-blind peer review process as used by most professional journals. In your answer, identify the roles of the researchers, the editor, and the expert reviewers, and state whose identities are concealed.
Explain how the editor must handle the identities of the prominent psychologist and the expert reviewers. Additionally, explain the fundamental purpose of utilizing this double-blind design instead of allowing the identities to be known.
Suppose you are preparing a submitted manuscript for a double-blind peer review. What action must you take regarding the manuscript's text before sending it to the reviewers, and what are the three possible decisions the editor can make based on the reviewers' recommendations?