Case Study

Diagnose the fundamental flaw in Dr. Miller's initial study design based on the conditions for non-experimental research. How must he alter his approach to investigate this potential causal relationship?

Case context: Dr. Miller is designing a study to answer the following research question: Does damage to a person's hippocampus impair the formation of long-term memory traces? Initially, he considers designing a true experiment where he randomly assigns half of his healthy participants to receive a minor surgical lesion to their hippocampus, while the other half receives a placebo surgery.

Question: Diagnose the fundamental flaw in Dr. Miller's initial study design based on the conditions for non-experimental research. How must he alter his approach to investigate this potential causal relationship?

Sample answer: Dr. Miller's initial design involves a severe ethical barrier; it is highly unethical to intentionally manipulate the independent variable by causing brain damage to healthy participants. Because he cannot deliberately alter these conditions, he must use a non-experimental design and rely on observing naturally occurring differences, such as recruiting patients who already have pre-existing hippocampus damage and comparing them to those who do not.

Key points:

  • Identification of an ethical barrier
  • Recognition that the independent variable (hippocampus damage) cannot be deliberately manipulated
  • Requirement to shift to a non-experimental design
  • Need to observe pre-existing, naturally occurring differences

Rubric: A correct response must demonstrate comprehension by identifying the ethical constraint preventing the deliberate manipulation of the hippocampus. It must also correctly explain that the researcher must shift to observing pre-existing, naturally occurring differences in hippocampus damage.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-27

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related