Evaluating Arguments for Environmental Action
Two policymakers are debating a new law that would require significant present-day economic sacrifices to prevent environmental damage expected to occur 100 years from now.
- Policymaker A argues: 'We must pass this law because we have a moral duty to ensure that those who come after us inherit a planet that is at least as healthy and prosperous as the one we enjoy.'
- Policymaker B argues: 'We should only pass this law if we can prove that the long-term economic benefits to the future global economy will outweigh our current costs. It's a matter of a sound cost-benefit calculation.'
Critique both arguments. Which policymaker's justification provides a more robust and ethically sound basis for representing the interests of future generations in current decision-making? Justify your evaluation.
0
1
Tags
Social Science
Empirical Science
Science
CORE Econ
Economy
Economics
Introduction to Microeconomics Course
The Economy 2.0 Microeconomics @ CORE Econ
Evaluation in Bloom's Taxonomy
Cognitive Psychology
Psychology
Related
Intergenerational Discounting in Environmental Economics
Justifying Long-Term Environmental Investment
A government is considering a proposal to invest heavily in new, expensive technology to capture and store carbon emissions. A key argument in favor of the proposal is that while the costs are borne today, the primary benefits—a more stable climate—will be realized by people living several decades from now. Which of the following principles is the most fundamental justification for the current generation accepting these costs on behalf of future generations?
The primary ethical justification for the current generation to invest in long-term environmental protection is the assumption that future generations will be contractually or legally bound to repay the costs incurred today.
Evaluating Ethical Commitments in Environmental Policy
Representing Future Interests in Policy
Match each policy decision with the specific ethical principle regarding future generations that best justifies it. Each principle reflects a different way the current generation's concern for the future is put into practice.
In discussions about long-term environmental policy, the inclusion of benefits for people not yet born relies on the ________ of individuals today to care about the well-being of others, rather than on any direct representation or voting power from future populations.
Analyzing Ethical Stances in Climate Policy Debate
A city council is debating whether to fund a costly, long-term project to protect its freshwater aquifer from potential contamination that is only likely to become a severe threat in 50-100 years. Several arguments are presented during the debate. Which of the following arguments relies least on an ethical commitment to the well-being of future generations?
Evaluating Arguments for Environmental Action