Learn Before
Exempt Research
In federal research regulations, exempt research represents the lowest level of risk and includes studies such as the evaluation of normal educational activities, the use of standard, non-sensitive psychological measures that maintain confidentiality, or research utilizing existing public data. Once this type of research receives initial approval, it is considered exempt from regular, continuous review by an institutional review board.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Ethical Review of a Research Proposal
A psychologist proposes a study to examine the effects of 48 hours of continuous sleep deprivation on the problem-solving skills of student volunteers. The proposal states that participants will be compensated and that the findings could have important implications for understanding workplace safety. When this proposal is submitted for review, what is the most critical issue the review committee responsible for protecting human participants will focus on?
Addressing IRB Concerns
Informed Consent Form
Minimal Risk
Institutional Approval
Expedited Research
Exempt Research
What is the primary responsibility of an Institutional Review Board (IRB)?
An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is permitted to consist entirely of scientific experts from the same university to ensure the most rigorous technical review of research protocols.
Match each specific research decision with the Institutional Review Board (IRB) ethical criterion it is designed to satisfy.
A psychologist proposes a study on the impact of social isolation on cognitive performance. Arrange the following ethical determinations in the logical order an Institutional Review Board (IRB) must perform them to satisfy the federal mandate of risk-benefit optimization.
A researcher argues that their university's Institutional Review Board (IRB) is 'unqualified' to review their neuroimaging study because one of the mandatory members is a local librarian with no scientific background. According to federal guidelines, this researcher's evaluation is ______ because the board is legally required to include at least one nonscientist to ensure that research protocols are viewed from a broad ethical perspective outside of the scientific community.
According to federal regulations, what is the minimum number of members required to form an Institutional Review Board (IRB), and what is one of the mandatory requirements for its composition?
Match each Institutional Review Board (IRB) requirement or function with its correct description based on federal ethical guidelines in psychological research.
A university forms an Institutional Review Board (IRB) composed of psychology professors and the university’s Director of Human Resources. This committee satisfies the federal requirement of having at least member who is unaffiliated with the institution.
A researcher submits a study design investigating the effects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performance. Arrange the steps an Institutional Review Board (IRB) takes to analyze and approve this research proposal in the correct logical order.
Suppose you are the director of a new research hospital and must establish its first Institutional Review Board (IRB) to oversee psychological and medical studies. Which of the following configurations successfully constructs a board that adheres to all federal requirements for diversity, scientific representation, and institutional independence?
Federal regulations require that an institutional review board be composed entirely of scientists in order to properly evaluate research protocols for potential ethical problems.
An Institutional Review Board (IRB) evaluates a research protocol where participants are initially deceived about the study's true purpose. The board approves the protocol only on the condition that participants receive a full explanation of the deception immediately following the session. In this scenario, the board is making a judgment that the modified _____ procedures are adequate to meet ethical standards for participant autonomy.
A newly established psychiatric hospital receiving federal funding is forming its first Institutional Review Board (IRB) to review proposed psychological studies. The hospital administration suggests a committee consisting of three clinical psychologists from the hospital staff, one hospital financial director, and one psychiatric nurse also employed by the hospital. Explain whether this proposed committee meets the federal composition requirements for an IRB, referencing specific criteria. Then, outline the primary responsibilities this committee will have once established.
Analyze this scenario from the perspective of an Institutional Review Board (IRB) reviewer. Diagnose the ethical shortcomings of the proposed research protocol based on the core criteria the IRB is responsible for ensuring. How should the board decide on this protocol, and what specific modifications should they require the researcher to make before granting approval?
A university researcher argues that since their study on student exam anxiety only uses an anonymous online survey and presents no physical risk, they do not need to submit their research protocol to the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Evaluate the validity of this researcher's argument based on federal IRB regulations.
Learn After
Greater Than Minimal Risk Research
According to federal research regulations, which of the following statements accurately describes 'exempt research'?
If a psychological study analyzing existing public data is classified as representing the lowest level of risk, it will still require regular, continuous review by an institutional review board after its initial approval.
Match each psychology research scenario to the specific category of Exempt Research it best illustrates according to federal regulations.
A psychology researcher is planning a study using standard, non-sensitive psychological measures to evaluate participant stress levels while ensuring complete confidentiality. Arrange the following regulatory milestones in the correct sequence to reflect the process for 'Exempt Research'.
According to federal regulations, what specific conditions must be met for a research study using standard psychological measures to qualify for 'Exempt Research' status?
To demonstrate your understanding of the scope and oversight of 'exempt' research in psychology, match each category or regulatory condition to the description that best defines its role in federal guidelines.
In federal research regulations, the ethical justification for designating a study as 'Exempt'—thereby removing the requirement for ongoing monitoring—is based on the evaluative conclusion that the research poses the _____ level of risk to participants.
Dr. Aris designs a study to evaluate a standard educational activity in his college course. According to federal guidelines, once this study receives initial approval, Dr. Aris is required to submit it for regular, continuous reviews by the Institutional Review Board.
A researcher is using standard, non-sensitive psychological measures to study personality traits. To determine if this study qualifies as exempt research and is thus exempt from ongoing IRB review after initial approval, the researcher must ensure the administration of these measures maintains _____.
A psychology researcher wants to conduct a study using existing public data. Order the regulatory milestones for this study from the initial assessment of risk to the final oversight status under federal regulations.
According to federal research regulations, what level of risk does exempt research represent, what are three specific examples of studies that qualify for this designation, and what is the status of such studies regarding ongoing IRB review after initial approval?
Explain why Dr. Vance's proposed study meets the federal criteria for exempt research, and clarify what her ongoing IRB review requirements will be once she obtains initial approval.
A developmental psychologist plans to conduct a study using existing public data from a government census. Apply federal regulations to identify the risk level of this study, and determine if it will require continuous IRB monitoring after its initial approval.