Learn Before
Case Study

Explain why Dr. Vance's proposed study meets the federal criteria for exempt research, and clarify what her ongoing IRB review requirements will be once she obtains initial approval.

Case context: Dr. Vance is designing a study to investigate learning styles by observing normal, everyday classroom activities in an introductory psychology course. She knows she needs to submit her protocol to the Institutional Review Board (IRB), but she is hoping to qualify for 'exempt' status to minimize ongoing administrative oversight, as she believes her study poses no extra risk to students.

Question: Explain why Dr. Vance's proposed study meets the federal criteria for exempt research, and clarify what her ongoing IRB review requirements will be once she obtains initial approval.

Sample answer: Dr. Vance's study qualifies for exempt research because it involves the evaluation of normal educational activities, which represents the lowest level of risk. Under federal regulations, once she receives initial approval, her study will be exempt from regular, continuous review by the IRB.

Key points:

  • The study qualifies because it evaluates normal educational activities.
  • Normal educational activities represent the lowest level of risk under federal guidelines.
  • Exempt status means the study is free from regular, continuous review by the IRB after initial approval.

Rubric: The explanation must link the study's focus on normal educational activities to the definition of exempt research as representing the lowest level of risk. It must also explain that the ongoing requirement is that the study is exempt from regular, continuous IRB review after initial approval.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-27

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related