Learn Before
Explain how a critic who opposes animal research would interpret the investigator's justification, and describe how the specific conditions of this study align with the core arguments against animal research outlined in the text.
Case context: A research laboratory is planning a study to investigate the neural pathways of fear. They plan to house rats in isolation in small metal cages, restrict their access to water for 22 hours a day, subject them to mild electrical shocks to induce fear, perform stereotaxic surgery to implant electrodes, and euthanize them at the conclusion of the study. The lead investigator argues that because the research follows standard laboratory regulations, it is ethically sound.
Question: Explain how a critic who opposes animal research would interpret the investigator's justification, and describe how the specific conditions of this study align with the core arguments against animal research outlined in the text.
Sample answer: A critic would argue that following standard laboratory regulations does not make the study ethically acceptable. The critic would point out that the rats cannot give informed consent. Furthermore, the procedures planned—isolated confinement in cages, water restriction, painful electrical shocks, surgery, and euthanasia—directly correspond to the forms of suffering (rigid confinement, deprivation, pain, operations, and euthanasia) that critics argue make animal research ethically unacceptable.
Key points:
- Compliance with regulations does not address the lack of informed consent.
- The case features confinement and deprivation, which critics argue cause suffering.
- The case features pain, surgery, and euthanasia, which are key sources of procedural suffering described in the text.
- The critic's view is that such procedures are rarely, if ever, ethically acceptable due to these combined issues.
Rubric: The response must demonstrate comprehension of the critic's perspective by explaining that regulatory compliance does not address the fundamental issue of lack of consent. It must also map the specific conditions of the case study (caging, water restriction, shocks, surgery, euthanasia) to the forms of suffering identified in the text (confinement, deprivation, pain, operations, euthanasia).
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
APA Standard 8.09
Which of the following is a primary ethical argument against using nonhuman animal subjects in psychological research?
Critics who oppose the use of nonhuman animals in psychological research base their objection primarily on the claim that animal studies do not yield scientifically useful data.
A psychology researcher is designing a protocol to study spatial learning in mice. Match the specific elements of this proposed research design with the corresponding ethical arguments frequently raised by critics of nonhuman animal research.
In analyzing the ethical arguments against the use of nonhuman animals in psychology, critics point to an escalating series of procedural harms. Arrange these laboratory stages in the typical order they are carried out, reflecting the path from baseline captivity to the final experimental consequence.
A researcher argues that their study involving the surgical implantation of electrodes in rats is ethical because it follows all legal guidelines for laboratory animal care. A critic of animal research would evaluate this justification as insufficient, arguing that the practice is fundamentally unethical because the subjects are incapable of providing ______.
Suppose you are tasked with creating a novel 'Ethical-First' research plan for a psychological study. To specifically address the ethical arguments regarding the inability of nonhuman animals to provide informed consent and the procedural harms of laboratory confinement and food/water deprivation, which of the following research designs should you build?
Critics who argue against the ethical acceptability of nonhuman animal research only object to highly invasive procedures like surgery, while viewing rigid confinement and food or water deprivation as acceptable.
Match each core ethical argument against the use of nonhuman animal subjects in psychological research with the statement that best explains its underlying rationale.
A critic of animal research draws a parallel to the ethics of deception in human research, arguing that in both situations researchers proceed without the subjects' _____. By identifying this shared absence across two very different research contexts, the critic reveals what they view as the foundational ethical flaw in both practices.
A critic of animal research is evaluating a proposed study protocol and must judge the relative ethical weight of each procedural condition described. Using the framework of critics who argue that animal research is rarely, if ever, ethically acceptable, rank the following procedural conditions from least ethically severe (1) to most ethically severe (5), based on the degree and irreversibility of suffering imposed on a subject incapable of giving informed consent.
Explain the primary arguments against the ethical acceptability of using nonhuman animal subjects in psychological research as presented in the text, highlighting the issue of consent and the typical experimental procedures that cause suffering.
Explain how a critic who opposes animal research would interpret the investigator's justification, and describe how the specific conditions of this study align with the core arguments against animal research outlined in the text.
A psychology professor proposes a study in which mice will be placed in cold water to test a drug's effect on swimming stamina, after which they will be euthanized. Apply the ethical arguments against animal research to write a two-sentence objection to this proposal addressing consent and procedural suffering.