Case Study

Explain whether this pattern indicates an effective intervention according to the criteria of an interrupted time-series design, and justify your conclusion based on the observed short-term versus long-term trends of student absences.

Case context: An instructor tracks weekly student absences for six weeks, observing a high, stable rate of absences. In week seven, the instructor introduces a new policy: they begin publicly taking attendance at the start of each class. The instructor continues to track weekly absences for six more weeks. They observe that absences drop immediately in week seven but then gradually return to their high pre-treatment levels by week ten, showing no difference in the long-term average trend by the end of the study.

Question: Explain whether this pattern indicates an effective intervention according to the criteria of an interrupted time-series design, and justify your conclusion based on the observed short-term versus long-term trends of student absences.

Sample answer: This pattern indicates that the intervention was ineffective. Although there was an immediate drop in absences in the week the policy was introduced, the drop was not sustained. According to the criteria of an interrupted time-series design, an effective treatment must show an immediate and sustained drop. Because the long-term trend returned to the pre-treatment average, the intervention failed to produce a meaningful effect.

Key points:

  • Conclude that the treatment was ineffective.
  • Explain that the initial drop in absences was not sustained.
  • Explain that the long-term average trend remained unchanged compared to pre-intervention levels.

Rubric: Answers must explain that the treatment was ineffective because the initial drop in absences was not sustained, and that the long-term average trend remained unchanged.

0

1

Updated 2026-05-27

Contributors are:

Who are from:

Tags

KPU

Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU

Related