Explain why the researcher cannot confidently conclude that the exercise program is a universally effective, long-term intervention based on these findings. Diagnose the issue created by the clinical patients stopping the exercise program and justify your response using the design's replication logic.
Case context: A psychological researcher conducts a study using a pretest-posttest design with switching replication to test an exercise intervention for depression. The two nonequivalent groups are clinical patients and university students. Initially, baseline depression scores are recorded. Clinical patients then start the exercise routine while university students wait. At the second measurement, only the patients' depression scores decrease. Then, university students start the exercise program, but clinical patients stop their exercise routine due to scheduling conflicts. At the final assessment, the students' depression scores decrease, but the patients' depression scores return to baseline levels.
Question: Explain why the researcher cannot confidently conclude that the exercise program is a universally effective, long-term intervention based on these findings. Diagnose the issue created by the clinical patients stopping the exercise program and justify your response using the design's replication logic.
Sample answer: The researcher cannot conclude that the exercise program is a universally effective, long-term intervention because the clinical patients did not maintain the treatment in the second phase, leading to their scores returning to baseline. This treatment removal introduces a confound, meaning we do not know if the exercise program has lasting effects once stopped or if the replication is clean. Although the students showed a decrease after starting the program, confirming short-term efficacy, the lack of sustained treatment in the patient group prevents a conclusion about the long-term stability of the intervention's efficacy.
Key points:
- The initial phase showed the exercise program was effective for clinical patients.
- The replication phase successfully showed a decrease in depression for university students once they started the program.
- The clinical patients stopping the routine represents a treatment removal, which caused their depression scores to return to baseline.
- This prevents the researcher from demonstrating that the treatment effects are stable or long-term when the intervention is not maintained.
Rubric: The response must identify that the clinical patients stopping the exercise routine represents a failure to maintain the treatment (treatment removal). It should explain that while the university students replicated the initial positive effect (reduction in depression), the lack of treatment maintenance in patients prevents conclusions about long-term efficacy or sustained benefits.
0
1
Tags
KPU
Research Methods in Psychology - 4th American Edition @ KPU
Related
Example of a Switching Replication with Treatment Removal Design
Arrange the procedural steps of the pretest-posttest design with switching replication in the correct order, as illustrated by the study testing an exercise program for depression on clinical patients and university students.
In a study assessing an exercise program for depression, clinical patients receive the treatment first while university students serve as a waiting group. After the first post-intervention assessment, the university students then begin the same exercise program. What is the primary scientific purpose of having the university students start the program at a later stage in this specific design?
In a study assessing an exercise program for depression using a switching replication design, clinical patients receive the treatment first while university students serve as a waiting group. Later, the university students also begin the program while patients maintain it. Match each group and phase with the expected outcome if the intervention is effective.
In a switching replication study testing an exercise program for depression, if both the clinical patients (who are receiving the treatment) and the university students (who are currently waiting) show an identical decrease in depression at the same time, the researcher should conclude that the exercise program is the primary cause of the patients' improvement.
If you were tasked with building a research protocol to test an exercise program for depression using clinical patients and university students, which of the following experimental structures would you implement to ensure the treatment's effect is replicated across both populations by having each group eventually serve as a comparison for the other?
In the example of a pretest-posttest design with switching replication testing an exercise program for depression, the clinical patients and the university students begin the exercise routine simultaneously immediately following the baseline measurement.
In a research study where an exercise program for depression is first administered to clinical patients while university students wait, and then later administered to the university students, a researcher finds that both groups show significant improvement only after they begin the program. This pattern of results allows the researcher to evaluate the intervention's _____ as being high, because the treatment's efficacy has been confirmed across two distinct and nonequivalent populations at different points in time.
In a study testing an exercise program for depression, baseline depression scores are recorded for clinical patients and university students. The clinical patients then engage in the exercise routine while the university students wait. If the exercise program is effective, the second measurement (taken before the university students start the program) should show a decrease in depression scores for the _____ group, while the university students' scores remain unchanged.
In a pretest-posttest design with switching replication testing an exercise program for depression, each observation or design feature serves a specific inferential role in the study's internal logic. Match each observation or feature to the inferential function it performs.
A researcher has completed a pretest-posttest study with switching replication testing an exercise program for depression. To rigorously evaluate whether the results justify a causal conclusion, the researcher must work through a series of inferential judgments. Arrange these evaluative steps in the order that most logically builds toward a defensible causal claim.
Describe the procedural timeline of a pretest-posttest design with switching replication, detailing when treatments are administered and when measurements are taken for the clinical patients and university students in the exercise program example.
Explain why the researcher cannot confidently conclude that the exercise program is a universally effective, long-term intervention based on these findings. Diagnose the issue created by the clinical patients stopping the exercise program and justify your response using the design's replication logic.
Imagine you are applying the pretest-posttest design with switching replication to study the exercise program for depression. If you observe that both the clinical patients and the university students show a significant decrease in depression at the second measurement (before the students have started the exercise program), what does this indicate about the internal validity of your study and the actual cause of the patients' improvement?