The results of this study indicate that overall, participants attended to critical feedback more than confirmatory feedback. Students revisiting critical feedback accounts for the overall significance between the difference in the time spent between valences (positive and negative feedback), as there was no difference in the original time spent between valences before revisiting the feedback. The mean number of gaze fixations on critical feedback was significantly larger than that of confirmatory feedback. The results showed that the mean number of feedback revisits differed in that participants revisited the critical feedback more than they revisited the confirmatory feedback. Furthermore, participants also dwelled on critical feedback longer per letter and per word than compared to confirmatory feedback. The study reveals that participants not only spent more time on critical feedback than confirmatory feedback, but participants also paid closer attention to critical feedback.